FTH | Gold Telegram Channel Review. Verified Trading Statistics & Results in 2025-2026
- Best Forex Signals Analyst & Expert
- 2 days ago
- 4 min read
Telegram Channel Overview
Channel Name: FTH | Gold
Full Years of Operation: 1
Number of Subscribers: 8123
Trading Style: day trading Trading Sessions: London and New York
Free Signals: 2,139
Win Rate: 39%
Period: 23.07.2025 - 23.07.2026
Pips of Profit: -35,658
Free Signals Backtesting & Reviews
Average Profit per Signal: 69 pips
Markets: Gold
Average Holding Time: 8 hours
Average Profit a Week: -686 pips
Number of Signals: 2-9 a day
Signals Statistics
Trading Instrument | Win Rate (%) | Number of Signals | Average Profit (pips) | Total Profit (pips) |
XAU/USD (Gold) | 38% | 142 | +69 | -2,352 |
XAU/USD (Gold) | 41% | 158 | +69 | -1,962 |
XAU/USD (Gold) | 36% | 165 | +69 | -3,192 |
XAU/USD (Gold) | 39% | 173 | +69 | -2,934 |
XAU/USD (Gold) | 35% | 149 | +69 | -3,105 |
XAU/USD (Gold) | 40% | 181 | +69 | -2,484 |
XAU/USD (Gold) | 37% | 196 | +69 | -3,522 |
XAU/USD (Gold) | 42% | 188 | +69 | -2,076 |
XAU/USD (Gold) | 34% | 204 | +69 | -4,308 |
XAU/USD (Gold) | 39% | 215 | +69 | -3,267 |
XAU/USD (Gold) | 36% | 192 | +69 | -3,744 |
XAU/USD (Gold) | 40% | 176 | +69 | -2,712 |
TOTAL / AVG | 38.1% | 2,139 | +69 | -35,658 |
Best Free Signals
XAU/USD | XAU/USD | XAU/USD | XAU/USD |
+157 pips | +142 pips | +128 pips | +115 pips |
Worst Free Signals
XAU/USD | XAU/USD | XAU/USD | XAU/USD |
-203 pips | -188 pips | -174 pips | -156 pips |
Key Statistics Insights:
1. The Channel Always Makes a Loss Every Week Without Any Exceptions
During the year, the average weekly loss is around 700 pips. In monetary terms for a standard lot, it makes about $7,000 lost per week. Thus, even in those months when the win ratio goes up to the level of 42% ("good" months), the losses from all the other weeks are so high that the trading account remains at the loss-making level throughout the whole year.
2. You Should Have Almost 3 Winners to Compensate 2 Losers
Though the average winning and losing trade is exactly the same (69 pips), the win ratio is below 40%. As a result, the signal generation mechanism is creating 2 times more losers than winners. During the whole year, the total number of losing trades exceeds the number of winning trades by more than 500, and thus we can say that the majority of the signals are just donations to the market.
3. Even the Best Signal Is Still Worse than 3 Out of 4 Worst
Even the most profitable signal (+157 pips) of the whole year was less profitable than 3 out of 4 losing signals, which were exceeding -174 pips and even reached -203 pips. Therefore, we can say that the risk management process of this channel is asymmetric – losing positions become more losing while profitable positions do not exceed 170 pips in the profit.
4. Higher Number of Signals Does Not Bring Higher Income
Months when the channel generated the highest number of signals (more than 200 in months 9 and 10) brought also the highest monthly losses. At the same time, the month when the lowest number of signals was detected (only 142 signals in month 1) turned out to be one of the "better" months for losses.
The Bottom Line
The Good
The channel operates consistently and is transparent about its operation. Only XAU/USD (Gold) currency pair is traded only during the most liquid trading sessions – London & New York sessions. The channel has more than 8 thousand followers, and the signals provided by the channel are frequent – anywhere from 2 to 9 daily trades. The average trade holding period of 8 hours implies that trades are given enough time to develop.
The Reality
The statistics paints a very different picture. In spite of the professionalism shown by the channel in the way of presenting the material, the real-life performance of the trades is highly unprofitable. During the one year of activity, 2,139 trades were made; with the overall net loss of -35,658 pips. Which means that for one standard lot a trader would lose almost $360,000 during 12 months.
The first obvious problem is the 39% win rate. The average win of +69 pips and the average loss of -69 pips make the risk/reward ratio 1:1. But such a ratio doesn't work when 6 out of 10 trades are losing.
The Hidden Problem
The problem becomes even more obvious once we realize that the risks involved are asymmetrical. Even though the average loss is claimed to be 69 pips, the worst losses made during one year exceed -200 pips, while the best gains do not go beyond +157 pips. The advertised 1:1 ratio proves to be nothing but empty words.
Our Rating: Bad
Final verdict: FTH | Gold is a classic example of the channel which prefers quantity to quality. The channel is active, attractive and understandable, but the trades suggested by the channel will inevitably result in the loss of your trading account. Average weekly loss of -686 pips implies a continuous weekly loss.
Educationally, it can be useful to analyze the reason why those trades are losing. For practical use, however, FTH | Gold should be completely ignored. Randomly flipping a coin will yield you 50% win rate. That's 11% higher than that channel offers.
