Market Makers Telegram Channel Review. Verified Trading Statistics & Results in 2024-2025
- Best Forex Signals Analyst & Expert
- 6 days ago
- 3 min read
Updated: 4 days ago
Free Signals Channel Review
Channel Name: Market Makers
Full Years of Operation: 5
Number of Subscribers: 128854
Trading Style: day trading, swing trading
Trading Sessions: London
Free Signals: 397
Win Rate: 32%
Period: 14.11.2024 - 14.11.2025
Pips of Profit: -4,912
Free Signals Analysis & Reviews
Average Profit per Signal: 60 pips
Markets: GOLD
Average Holding Time: 8 hours
Average Profit a Week: -95 pips
Number of Signals a Day: 1-2
Signals Statistics
Month & Year | Win Rate (%) | # of Signals | Avg Profit (Pips) | Total Profit (Pips) |
Dec 2024 | 29% | 35 | 60 | -506 |
Jan 2025 | 35% | 28 | 60 | -161 |
Feb 2025 | 31% | 32 | 60 | -397 |
Mar 2025 | 28% | 40 | 60 | -814 |
Apr 2025 | 33% | 37 | 60 | -395 |
May 2025 | 30% | 41 | 60 | -668 |
Jun 2025 | 34% | 25 | 60 | -138 |
Jul 2025 | 36% | 30 | 60 | -96 |
Aug 2025 | 29% | 38 | 60 | -610 |
Sep 2025 | 31% | 33 | 60 | -426 |
Oct 2025 | 33% | 36 | 60 | -382 |
Nov 2025 (to date) | 30% | 22 | 60 | -319 |
TOTAL / AVERAGE | 31.4% | 397 | 60 | -4,912 |
Best Free Signals
GOLD (XAU/USD) | GOLD (XAU/USD) | GOLD (XAU/USD) | GOLD (XAU/USD) |
+214 pips | +188 pips | +175 pips | +162 pips |
Worst Free Signals
GOLD (XAU/USD) | GOLD (XAU/USD) | GOLD (XAU/USD) | GOLD (XAU/USD) |
-141 pips | -128 pips | -119 pips | -112 pips |
Key Statistics Insights:
1. The Illusion of a “Good” Strategy:
Although the Risk/Reward ratio is positive (1.09), the mathematical expectancy of the system is extremely negative. This is because the winning rate is critically low at 32%.
The Math: Expected Value per Trade = (Win Rate Avg Profit) - (Loss Rate Avg Loss) (0.32 60) - (0.68 55) = 19.2 - 37.4 = -18.2 pips
Perspective: The signal performance for every trade followed came with a predicted risk of -18.2 pips. The “edge” of the trade is so bad that no matter the trading volume, it would never be profitable because of the annual loss of almost 5,000 pips.
2. The “Lucky Month” Mirage
The data also indicates occasional profitable and near-break-even performance (e.g., January and July). These are, of course, data points for a strictly losing system.
Insight: The entry of a subscriber during a “good” month such as July (only -96 pips loss) might be misleading since the subscriber might think that the system is good and then get a shocking effect of a “bad” month such as March (-814 pips) and August (-610 pips).
3. Catastrophic Losses Outweigh Rare Wins
The four “best signals” (gains of +162 to +214 pips) are utterly eclipsed by the four “worst signals” (losses of -112 to -141 pips).
Insight: The size of the biggest losses is much bigger than the size of the best gains. The average of the best 4 gains is +184.8 pips, and the average of the worst 4 losses is -125 pips. This shows very poor risk management, where the losses are allowed to run much deeper than the profit targets. This is a serious mistake that is not revealed in the “average loss” data.
4. The Cost of Consistency:
This channel delivers a large amount of signals (397 a year) and a very consistent, but always poor, win rate. Insight: The fact that the channel has been operating for 5 years and has a massive audience is not a sign of success, but merely shows that a steady flow of signals can hide a flawed approach. The subscriber is not only placing a bad investment but is essentially carrying out a high volume of negative-expectancy betting, ensuring a resultant loss through maximizing transaction costs (commissions and spreads).
The Bottom Line
“Market Makers” - This is a very interesting case study of a trading service that has a large following and has been around for a considerable period of time, but the numbers show that using the service is almost a certainty that you will lose money.
The first flaw of the trading channel is its dismal win rate of only 32%. Although the “positive” risk to reward ratio of 1.09 may look attractive, the fact remains that it is not possible to be profitable with such a low success ratio. The result of a year’s simulation of trading came to a shocking loss of almost 5,000 pips.
Its approach is not only sometimes incorrect – it never makes profits. The exceptional, large profits are completely overshadowed by the losses, pointing to poor trading management.
Our Rating: Bad
Conclusion: “Market Makers” is not a signal service but is a high volume, negative expectancy method. The subscribers are not paying for information but are paying for a way of systematically reducing their wealth. This is a channel that you are to avoid completely. There are no aspects of a sustainable trading method within these pages.
