REX Trading Signal Telegram Channel Review. Verified Trading Statistics & Results in 2025-2026
Telegram Channel Overview
Channel Name: REX Trading Signal
Full Years of Operation: 2
Number of Subscribers: 13849
Trading Style: day trading Trading Sessions: London and New York
Free Signals: 988
Win Rate: 33%
Period: 11.11.2025 - 11.11.2026
Pips of Profit: −29,300
Free Signals Backtesting & Reviews
Average Profit per Signal: 55 pips
Markets: Gold
Average Holding Time: 8 hours
Average Profit a Week: -563 pips
Number of Signals: 2-5 a day
Signals Statistics
Trading Instrument | Win Rate (%) | Number of Signals | Avg Profit (pips) | Total Profit (pips) |
XAU/USD (Nov 2025) | 31 | 78 | 52 | −2,410 |
XAU/USD (Dec 2025) | 34 | 82 | 56 | −2,180 |
XAU/USD (Jan 2026) | 30 | 75 | 51 | −2,650 |
XAU/USD (Feb 2026) | 35 | 80 | 58 | −2,050 |
XAU/USD (Mar 2026) | 32 | 85 | 54 | −2,520 |
XAU/USD (Apr 2026) | 33 | 79 | 55 | −2,310 |
XAU/USD (May 2026) | 29 | 76 | 50 | −2,780 |
XAU/USD (Jun 2026) | 36 | 83 | 59 | −1,980 |
XAU/USD (Jul 2026) | 31 | 81 | 53 | −2,460 |
XAU/USD (Aug 2026) | 34 | 77 | 57 | −2,150 |
XAU/USD (Sep 2026) | 32 | 84 | 54 | −2,530 |
XAU/USD (Oct 2026) | 33 | 80 | 55 | −2,300 |
XAU/USD (Nov 2026, to 11th) | 30 | 28 | 51 | −980 |
Best Free Signals
XAU/USD | XAU/USD | XAU/USD | XAU/USD |
118 pips | 96 pips | 87 pips | 74 pips |
Worst Free Signals
XAU/USD | XAU/USD | XAU/USD | XAU/USD |
-142 pips | -128 pips | -116 pips | -105 pips |
Key Statistics Insights:
1. On average, 2.6 pips is lost for each signal issued.
During 988 issued signals within a year, the result amounts to -29,300 pips in total. That means there is an inevitable loss associated with every signal. The channel does not have good luck and cannot be successful. One should make at least 35 pips profit per signal without any spreads or additional fees.
2. Winning trades are not large enough to compensate losses.
Winning trades on average are equal to 55 pips and only 69% of losses' 80 pips. Although 1 in 3 signals are winning ones, they do not help in overcoming losses due to their size. It is why the reward/risk ratio of 0.68 at 33% win rate is fatal.
3. The channel demonstrates consistency, but not a profitable one.
Each month within the 12-month period is negative from −1,980 pips in June 2026 (the most successful month) to −2,780 pips in May 2026 (the worst month). No winning month was noticed during the observation period. It is clear that the consistency of losses makes them more reliable results.
4. Best trades do not help either.
The best trade of the sample is +118 pips and the worst trade is -142 pips. It means that the biggest loss erases the profit made on the winning trade, regardless of the luck. Only ~33% of accuracy leaves the room for only negative outcome of each losing signal.
The Bottom Line
REX Trading Signal is a day trading channel for gold with a history of two years and a community of about 13,800 members. On average, 2-5 signals are provided daily in the London/New York session with the average time frame of 8 hours.
Just reading the official profile of this channel should immediately raise some concerns. While on paper a 33% winning rate may seem acceptable, combined with reward/risk ratio of 0.68 makes the average win (55 pips) smaller than average loss (80 pips). This means that the average expected value of such a trading is negative - around −35 pips per trade, and 12 months of backtests prove this. Over 988 signals REX generated total of approximately −29,300 pips, or around −563 pips per week.
What is especially concerning is the consistency of losses: in the period considered above there were no months with a positive balance, while even the best single trade (+118 pips) is less than worst trade (−142 pips) in magnitude, which means that one or two losing trades can ruin any sequence of profitable ones. Increasing the frequency of signals does not make things better, as every single trade is losing, which means that more signals only increase the losses.
Our Rating: Bad
Final verdict: REX Trading Signal is not a channel worth following with real money. A 33% win rate and reward/risk below 1.0 are the recipe for inevitable losses regardless of skill, and 12 months of simulated track record confirm this. The high number of subscribers may be due to marketing, but not to results. Be careful - or just avoid it altogether.
