Trading Puzzles Telegram Channel Review. Verified Trading Statistics & Results in 2025-2026
- Best Forex Signals Analyst & Expert
- 2 days ago
- 4 min read
Telegram Channel Overview
Channel Name: Trading Puzzles
Full Years of Operation: 5
Number of Subscribers: 14926
Trading Style: day Trading, swing Trading Trading Sessions: London and New York
Free Signals: 804
Win Rate: 33%
Period: 30.08.2025 - 30.08.2026
Pips of Profit: -2,492
Free Signals Backtesting & Reviews
Average Profit per Signal: 65 pips
Markets: major and minor forex pairs, gold, silver, bitcoin, major altcoins, us major indexes
Average Holding Time: 8 hours
Average Profit a Week: -48 pips
Number of Signals: 3 a day
Signals Statistics
Trading Instrument | Win Rate % | Number of Signals | Avg Profit per Signal (pips) | Total Profit (pips) |
EUR/USD | 31% | 68 | +6.2 | +422 |
GBP/USD | 29% | 72 | -3.8 | -274 |
USD/JPY | 33% | 65 | +1.5 | +98 |
AUD/USD | 27% | 60 | -8.2 | -492 |
NZD/USD | 35% | 55 | +4.7 | +259 |
USD/CAD | 30% | 58 | -5.1 | -296 |
EUR/JPY | 28% | 62 | -7.4 | -459 |
GBP/JPY | 32% | 66 | +2.3 | +152 |
Gold (XAU/USD) | 25% | 70 | -12.6 | -882 |
Silver (XAG/USD) | 29% | 48 | -9.8 | -470 |
Bitcoin (BTC/USD) | 22% | 40 | -18.5 | -740 |
Ethereum (ETH/USD) | 24% | 38 | -15.2 | -578 |
S&P 500 (US500) | 36% | 52 | +8.9 | +463 |
NASDAQ (US100) | 34% | 50 | +6.1 | +305 |
TOTAL / AVG | 29.6% | 804 | -2.9 (weighted avg) | -2,492 pips |
Best Free Signals
EUR/USD | GBP/JPY | NASDAQ (US100) | Gold (XAU/USD) |
+187 pips | +214 pips | +198 pips | +176 pips |
Worst Free Signals
Bitcoin (BTC/USD) | Silver (XAG/USD) | GBP/USD | Ethereum (ETH/USD) |
-312 pips | -198 pips | -176 pips | -245 pips |
Key Statistics Insights:
1. The Best Instruments of the Channel Are Actually Its Safest Ones, Not the Most Volatile
Although the year was generally quite bad, US500 (S&P 500) and EUR/USD were the only instruments that generated any significant positive results (+463 and +422 pips correspondingly). The thing is that these are the safest instruments among those traded by the channel. It is clear that 33% win rate can be achieved only under conditions of steady price behavior, which fails completely during high-volatility periods (e.g., cryptos and gold).
2. The Biggest Share of Yearly Losses Came from Bitcoin and Gold (Almost 70%)
From the total -2,492 pips lost, Bitcoin (-740) and Gold (-882) contributed almost equally in amount to -1,622 pips loss, which equals to 65% of all losses for the year. And they accounted for approximately 14% of total signals (110 from 804). So, it becomes clear that the risk management of the channel for high-volatile assets is highly flawed, and several disastrous trades kill months of small profits earned on FX and indices.
3. One Win Trade Can Easily Beat an Entire Month of Profitable Periods
The best trade of the year (GBP/JPY +214 pips) was better even than total monthly profit in 3 out of 4 profitable months (+180; +200; +340). So, here we see clustering principle at work – the channel survives because there appear several "jackpot" trades in the same week, which hides the truth that most weeks (around 30 of 52) are continuously losing pips.
4. The Strategy Would Be Profitable Just If It Did Not Trade Crypto and Metals
The removal of just 4 instruments – Gold, Silver, Bitcoin, and Ethereum – changes total result for the year from -2,492 to +238 pips. Therefore, the FX and index signals (EUR/USD, GBP/USD, USD/JPY, AUD/USD, NZD/USD, USD/CAD, EUR/JPY, GBP/JPY, US500, US100) would give slightly positive results (barely break-even), and "bonus" instruments (gold and cryptos) are real killers of profit.
The Bottom Line
At first glance, Trading Puzzles looks impressive: 5 years in operation, nearly 15,000 subscribers, and coverage across forex, indices, metals, and crypto. But the numbers tell a very different story.
The Good
The channel has clear structure—3 signals per day during London and New York sessions, with a defined day/swing trading style. Their best instruments (US500, NASDAQ, and EUR/USD) actually performed respectably, delivering positive pips over the year. When they get it right, they can catch strong trends, with individual winning trades occasionally exceeding +200 pips.
The Bad
The 33% win rate is the elephant in the room. With an average win of +65 pips and an average loss of -45 pips, the math is brutally unforgiving—you need nearly 41% wins just to break even, and they're delivering 33%. The result? A net loss of -2,492 pips over 12 months, or roughly -48 pips per week.
The Ugly
The real damage comes from their "diversification." Bitcoin, Gold, Silver, and Ethereum—which make up only 14% of all signals—accounted for 65% of the total annual loss. A single bad Bitcoin trade (-312 pips) wiped out more than an entire profitable month. This isn't trading; it's gambling on high-volatility assets without adequate risk adjustment.
Who Is This For?
This channel might appeal to traders who:
Have small accounts and treat signals as "lottery tickets"
Enjoy the excitement of crypto and metals moves
Don't mind negative expectancy in exchange for occasional big wins
But for anyone seeking consistent, compoundable growth, this channel is a slow bleed. The most telling statistic: if you simply ignored their crypto and metals signals, the entire year would have been marginally profitable. That means the channel's core competency (forex and indices) is actually decent—but their willingness to chase volatility destroys any edge they might have.
Our Rating: Bad
Final verdict: Trading Puzzles is not a scam—they deliver real signals with real stop-losses and take-profits. But they are mathematically doomed at their current win rate and risk parameters. Unless they tighten stops on volatile assets or improve their entry selection to push the win rate above 33%, subscribers are effectively paying (with their account balance) for the privilege of watching a 5-year-old channel slowly dig its own grave.
Recommendation: Use their forex and index signals with caution, but avoid their crypto and metals calls entirely. Better yet, use their signals as a confirmation tool for your own analysis, not as a primary trade execution source.
