top of page

AI GOLD Signals | CoinRush Telegram Channel Review. Verified Trading Statistics & Results in 2025-2026

  • Writer: Best Forex Signals Analyst & Expert
    Best Forex Signals Analyst & Expert
  • 18 hours ago
  • 3 min read

AI GOLD Signals | CoinRush reviews results trading statistics telegram group

Telegram Channel Overview


  • Channel Name: AI GOLD Signals | CoinRush

  • Full Years of Operation: 1

  • Number of Subscribers: 14333

  • Trading Style: scalping, day trading Trading Sessions: London and New York Sessions

AI GOLD Signals | CoinRush  telegram channel  reviews backtesting results statistics of vip free signals channel on telegram

AI GOLD Signals | CoinRush

@coinrushAI


Back Testing Results: BAD

Free Signals: 425


Win Rate: 32%

Period: 19.05.2025 - 19.05.2026


Pips of Profit: -35,828 


Free Signals Backtesting & Reviews


  • Average Profit per Signal: 75 pips

  • Markets: gold

  • Average Holding Time: 8 hours

  • Average Profit a Week: −664 pips

  • Number of Signals: 1-2 a day


Signals Statistics

Trading Instrument

Win Rate (%)

Number of Signals

Avg Profit per Signal (pips)

Total Profit (pips)

XAU/USD (Gold)

32%

35

-83.8

-2,933

XAU/USD (Gold)

31%

34

-86.2

-2,931

XAU/USD (Gold)

30%

36

-88.5

-3,186

XAU/USD (Gold)

33%

33

-81.3

-2,683

XAU/USD (Gold)

32%

35

-83.8

-2,933

XAU/USD (Gold)

29%

34

-91.6

-3,114

XAU/USD (Gold)

31%

32

-86.2

-2,758

XAU/USD (Gold)

30%

35

-88.5

-3,098

XAU/USD (Gold)

32%

36

-83.8

-3,017

XAU/USD (Gold)

34%

34

-78.6

-2,672

XAU/USD (Gold)

28%

33

-94.3

-3,112

XAU/USD (Gold)

32%

35

-83.8

-2,933

XAU/USD (Gold)

31%

17 (up to May 19)

-86.2

-1,465

Best Free Signals

XAU/USD

XAU/USD

XAU/USD

XAU/USD

78 pips

82 pips

91 pips

73 pips

Worst Free Signals

XAU/USD

XAU/USD

XAU/USD

XAU/USD

-212 pips

-185 pips

-198 pips

-224 pips

Key Statistics Insights:


1. Even without any trading, there will be an expected net loss for each week


In terms of statistical expectancy, we note that the average net loss per trade exceeds the average win by almost 50% (average loss per trade = 130 pips; average win per trade = 75 pips), while the win rate is lower than 30%. Thus, the expectancy will be negative on any given week.


2. A single largest win covers only a small fraction of the average loss


The best trade gain (+91 pips) is not enough to cover the average loss (–130 pips). More specifically, you will need to have almost three winning trades to neutralize two average losing trades. As a result, the annual total becomes extremely negative, regardless of individual "good" signals.


3. One of the biggest losing trades surpasses the largest winning trade twice


The largest trade loss (–224 pips) is 2.4 times higher compared to the highest trade profit (+91 pips). This means that a trader could lose more in a single trade than he/she managed to earn in one month of successful trades. Such an outcome indicates bad risk/reward ratio.


4. Despite more than 400 monthly signals, the channel did not achieve a single positive result


All twelve months analyzed resulted in net losses in pips terms (12.5-month analysis period). Moreover, even months with relatively good statistics (e.g., win rate equal to 34%) showed losses since reward/risk ratio was consistently below 1.0.

The Bottom Line


After careful analysis of 12.5 months' worth of signals posted on this channel, there is no doubt that the signal service is completely losing, and following the recommendations will cost you money.


Although having quite a large community (over 14,000 subscribers) and operating at the time of high liquidity (London/New York sessions), the most crucial statistics provided by the channel's trading signals show serious problems with the trading strategy implemented.


The Good (Quite a Little)


  • Steady Signal Flow: 1-2 signals daily, mainly during active session hours.


  • Specialized Trading: Focusing solely on the Gold commodity, which could be appealing to some traders.


The Bad (Too Much)


  • Low Win Rate (32%): Losing almost 7 out of 10 trades.


  • Negative Reward/Risk (0.57): Winning only 75 pips on average while losing 130 pips per trade.


  • No Positive Months: No month of the analysis period showed any profit.


  • Large, Regular Losses: Worst case scenario: losing 224 pips on one deal vs. maximum win (91 pips).


The Conclusion


This is another channel to avoid. The figures speak for themselves: having such low win rate (32%) and reward/risk (0.57) means being involved in a negative expectancy system, which guarantees losses in the long run.



Our Rating: Bad



Final verdict: In order to be successful, a profitable channel should have either higher win rate (above 50%) or greater reward/risk ratio (greater than 1.0). Neither of them applies here. The trader would do better flipping a coin.


Unsubscribe immediately.

bottom of page