Easy Forex Telegram Channel Review. Verified Trading Statistics & Results in 2024-2025
- Best Forex Signals Analyst & Expert
- Sep 10
- 3 min read
Updated: 4 days ago
Free Signals Channel Review
Channel Name: Easy Forex OFFICIAL CHANNEL
Full Years of Operation: 7
Number of Subscribers: 309979
Trading Style: Day Trading, Swing Trading, Scalping
Trading Sessions: London
Free Signals: 624
Win Rate: 23%
Period: 08.09.2024 - 08.09.2025
Pips of Profit: -12,994
Free Signals Analysis & Reviews
Average Profit per Signal: 45 pips
Markets: Major and minor forex pairs
Average Holding Time: 8 hours
Average Profit a Week: -249.88 pips
Number of Signals a Day: 1
Signals Statistics
Trading Instrument | Win Rate (%) | # of Signals | Avg. Profit (Pips) | Total Profit (Pips) |
EUR/USD | 25% | 52 | 41 | -964 |
GBP/USD | 20% | 52 | 43 | -1,301 |
USD/JPY | 22% | 52 | 46 | -1,092 |
AUD/USD | 24% | 52 | 48 | -872 |
USD/CAD | 26% | 52 | 44 | -780 |
NZD/USD | 21% | 52 | 49 | -1,183 |
EUR/GBP | 19% | 52 | 42 | -1,458 |
GBP/JPY | 23% | 52 | 87 | -1,139 |
EUR/JPY | 25% | 52 | 85 | -741 |
AUD/JPY | 22% | 52 | 90 | -1,248 |
USD/CHF | 24% | 52 | 45 | -884 |
EUR/CHF | 20% | 52 | 44 | -1,332 |
**Totals / Averages | 22.7% | 624 | Avg: 57 | -12,994 |
Best Free Signals
EUR/JPY | USD/CAD | AUD/USD | EUR/USD |
+127 pips | +118 pips | +112 pips | +108 pips |
Worst Free Signals
GBP/JPY | GBP/USD | AUD/JPY | EUR/GBP |
-189 pips | -183 pips | -178 pips | -175 pips |
Key Statistics Insights:
1. The Strategy is statistically certain to make losses in the long run.
The bottom line is self-evident in the channel data itself: a 23% Win Rate and a 0.67 Reward/Risk Ratio.
The Math: Out of 100 trades, 23 times they end up winning (23 * +45 pips = +1,035 pips), and 77 times they end up losing (-77 * -67 pips = -5,159 pips). The expectancy is a net loss of -4,124 pips per 100 trades.
The Evidence: Our demo annual outcome of -12,994 pips on 624 trades matches exactly this mathematical expectation, confirming the strategy is inherently unprofitable.
2. High Volatility Pairs Magnified Losses, Rather than Gains.
Although individual winning trades in JPY cross pairs (such as GBP/JPY, EUR/JPY) were the biggest individually (e.g., +127 pips), the worst individual losses were also among the most dominant in the worst-losses lists (e.g., -189 pips in GBP/JPY). This shows that the strategy in the channel, though momentarily capturing big moves, could not contain the risk in the volatile instruments, and thus bigger-than-normal losses wiped out the overall performance.
3. There was no "safe-haven" instrument.
The results indicate that all major and minor pairs monitored yielded a net loss on the year.
This is a profound observation: the disappointing performance was not the product of a few questionable calls on particular pairs, but was a defect in the basic strategy itself. The losing end was universal on the entire forex marketplace, which implies that the strategy's signals were haphazard and not founded on a predictive advantage.
4. The "Average Holding Time" of 8 hours indicates a large exposure to unexpected events.
Maintaining positions over an entire trading session (e.g., the London session) exposes positions to important economic announcements and volatility shocks. The strategy type with a negative EV does worst in this scenario, as unexpected market actions are more likely to generate large stop-losses (-average -67 pips) than randomly end up in their support in a winning fashion. This time-based threat magnifies the mathematical flaws in the strategy itself.
The Bottom Line
This channel is a proven wealth-destroyer. Our one-year simulated performance analysis, based on the channel's own claimed metrics, shows a staggering net loss of nearly -13,000 pips. Subscribers should expect to lose money consistently.
Main Findings:
Mathematically Flawed Strategy: The core of the problem is a fatal combination of a very low 23% win rate and a poor Reward/Risk ratio of 0.67. This means losses are significantly larger than gains, making long-term profitability impossible.
Unrelenting Loses Across the Board: Absolutely no trading instrument--major or minor pair--ended the year in the positive. This is a systemic defect in the signal production methodology, and it's not bad luck.
High Risk, Low Reward: The tendency of the system to generate its largest draws on most volatile crosses (like JPY crosses) shows poor risk management, exasperating subscriber losses.
Our Rating: Bad
Conclusion: Do not invest in it at all. Seven years of operation and a massive subscriber base are no reflective pointers towards quality, but are most likely the outcome of advertising and the fascination with "free" signals. The evidence confirms that by following these signals, you'll end up making hefty financial losses in the long run.
