EMMANUEL FOREX COMMUNITY Telegram Channel Review. Verified Trading Statistics & Results in 2025-2026
- Best Forex Signals Analyst & Expert
- 1 day ago
- 4 min read
Telegram Channel Overview
Channel Name: EMMANUEL FOREX COMMUNITY
Full Years of Operation: 7
Number of Subscribers: 107082
Trading Style: day trading Trading Sessions: New York and London
Free Signals: 549
Win Rate: 34%
Period: 02.07.2025 - 02.07.2026
Pips of Profit:-39,346
Free Signals Backtesting & Reviews
Average Profit per Signal: 53 pips
Markets: Gold
Average Holding Time: 8 hours
Average Profit a Week: −757 pips
Number of Signals: 1 a day
Signals Statistics
Month | Instrument | Win Rate (%) | Number of Signals | Avg Profit (pips) | Avg Loss (pips) | Total Profit (pips) |
Jul-25 | XAU/USD | 34% | 46 | +53 | -130 | -3,182 |
Aug-25 | XAU/USD | 33% | 44 | +52 | -131 | -3,196 |
Sep-25 | XAU/USD | 35% | 47 | +54 | -129 | -2,979 |
Oct-25 | XAU/USD | 32% | 45 | +51 | -132 | -3,357 |
Nov-25 | XAU/USD | 34% | 43 | +53 | -130 | -2,968 |
Dec-25 | XAU/USD | 31% | 48 | +52 | -133 | -3,744 |
Jan-26 | XAU/USD | 33% | 46 | +53 | -131 | -3,260 |
Feb-26 | XAU/USD | 34% | 42 | +54 | -130 | -2,868 |
Mar-26 | XAU/USD | 30% | 47 | +51 | -134 | -3,958 |
Apr-26 | XAU/USD | 33% | 45 | +52 | -132 | -3,288 |
May-26 | XAU/USD | 34% | 44 | +53 | -130 | -3,028 |
Jun-26 | XAU/USD | 32% | 46 | +50 | -133 | -3,518 |
Jul-26* | XAU/USD | 33% | 1 (partial) | +52 | -131 | -79 (1 loss) |
Best Free Signals
XAU/USD | XAU/USD | XAU/USD | XAU/USD |
+68 pips | +74 pips | +59 pips | +82 pips |
Worst Free Signals
XAU/USD | XAU/USD | XAU/USD | XAU/USD |
-187 pips | -215 pips | -163 pips | -241 pips |
Key Statistics Insights:
1. The Channel Loses More in a Single Week Than Most Traders Risk in a Month
Average weekly loss for this channel stands at -757 pips and therefore results in a loss of almost -$7,500 for each and every lot that trades through it per week. This translates to losses of almost -$400,000 per standard lot for 12 months (almost wipe out an adequately funded account).
2. The Worst Month Is Almost Double As Bad as the Best Month
Best month recorded a loss of -2,868 pips while the worst month saw a loss of -3,958 pips. This simply means that even in its best month, this channel made huge losses. There was not a single month in which the channel was profitable (no positive month in the year-long record).
3. The Best Single Trade Makes Less Than a Third of a Loss on Average
While the best single trading result was a gain of +82 pips, the worst single trading loss amounted to -241 pips. This means that in just one single losing trade, all profits made in three best winning trades would be wiped out. Unfortunately, losing trades occur twice as much as winning trades.
4. At Least 4 Winning Trades Are Needed to Cover One Average Loss
Given the average gain of +53 pips against average loss of -130 pips, it would require more than 4 winning trades (since 4 × 53 = 212 pips) to make up for one average losing trade. In order for the channel to breakeven with such risks to reward ratio, the win rate should be more than 71%.
The Bottom Line
Given that it has been running for 7 years now and has 107,000+ subscribers, one could say that this channel is quite established and credible. The main focus of the channel is purely on Gold (XAU/USD) within the London and New York sessions and it gives 1-2 trades per day with an average position being kept for 8 hours.
Unluckily, the statistics says something else.
Harsh Reality
Although it is established and has a large number of followers, it is simply structured to make a loss. Its win rate is only 34% and that is not even the biggest problem. Reward/Risk ratio is equal to 0.4, which means that traders lose two times more than they earn.
In the last 12 months, the channel made a loss of almost -40,000 pips or an average weekly loss of -757 pips. That means that the weekly loss of a trader using standard lots will be approximately -7,500$, which is close to -400,000$ per year.
The point is that in the last year there was not a single profitable month, which is extremely bad for the trading channel. Even the best month of the channel had a loss of -2,800 pips, while the worst month brought a total of -4,000 pips.
Quality of Trades
The trades itself don't look very good either. The best winning trade was only +82 pips, while the worst losing trade was -241 pips. It means that one losing trade takes away all the profit of 3 winning trades. Moreover, losses happen twice more frequently than wins.
Our Rating: Bad
Final verdict: Not recommended.
Although the channel has been running for 7 years already and has 107,000+ subscribers, it lacks one crucial thing for signal provider. The statistics show that it does not work. Losses will accumulate until traders have no money left in their accounts. In addition, it can cause a burnout pretty soon.
The performance of the channel with such number of subscribers and such longevity is surprising enough. It would be much better to reverse all the signals or simply avoid this channel and use those who has a positive expectancy instead.
