Forex Income Forever Telegram Channel Review. Verified Trading Statistics & Results in 2024-2025
- Best Forex Signals Analyst & Expert
- Oct 22
- 3 min read
Updated: 4 days ago
Free Signals Channel Review
Channel Name: Forex Income Forever
Full Years of Operation: 2
Number of Subscribers: 125627
Trading Style: day trading, swing trading
Trading Sessions: London
Free Signals: 377
Win Rate: 38%
Period: 22.10.2024 - 22.10.2025
Pips of Profit: -5,566
Free Signals Analysis & Reviews
Average Profit per Signal: 81 pips
Markets: gold
Average Holding Time: 8 hours
Average Profit a Week: -107 pips
Number of Signals a Day: 1-2
Signals Statistics
Trading Instrument | Win Rate (%) | # of Signals | Avg Profit (Pips) | Total Profit (Pips) |
XAU/USD | ||||
Oct 2025 | 41% | 32 | 78 | -264 |
Sep 2025 | 35% | 29 | 85 | -533 |
Aug 2025 | 40% | 31 | 79 | -341 |
Jul 2025 | 31% | 35 | 83 | -908 |
Jun 2025 | 44% | 33 | 76 | -132 |
May 2025 | 37% | 30 | 84 | -402 |
Apr 2025 | 39% | 34 | 80 | -446 |
Mar 2025 | 36% | 31 | 82 | -578 |
Feb 2025 | 42% | 29 | 77 | -167 |
Jan 2025 | 33% | 32 | 86 | -754 |
Dec 2024 | 38% | 28 | 81 | -366 |
Nov 2024 | 35% | 33 | 79 | -675 |
GRAND TOTAL | ~38% | 377 | ~81 | -5,566 |
Best Free Signals
XAU/USD | XAU/USD | XAU/USD | XAU/USD |
156 pips | 142 pips | 138 pips | 131 pips |
Worst Free Signals
XAU/USD | XAU/USD | XAU/USD | XAU/USD |
-98 pips | -92 pips | -88 pips | -85 pips |
Key Statistics Insights:
1. The Mathematical Impossibility of Profitability
Although the Reward/Risk of 1.24 is excellent, the poor 38% winning rate renders profitability mathematically inconceivable. 62% of the system's trades are losers. In order to break even on this kind of R/R, the system would need to have a 45% or so winning rate. To become consistently profitable, it would have to have 50% or better winning rate, which it has never enjoyed. This negative yearly P&L of -5,566 pips is the literal, unavoidable mathematical consequence of this.
2. Illusion of "Big Wins" Masking Ongoing Losses
The best signals of the channel (e.g., +156 pips) have the strong psychological appeal of potentially big rewards. But the data demonstrates this is an illusion of risk. Too few wins (+81 pips on average) are not substantial enough to offset the strong loss frequency (-65 pips on average). For each "big win," there are almost two losses, causing an eventual and certain equity drawdown, as the monthly results are consistently negative.
3. Extreme Consistency in the Wrong Metric
The system shows incredible consistency, not in profitability, but in failure. During the 12-month and 377-signal test, it never once produced a month that was positively profitable. It got as close as just short of break-even. That kind of consistency, along with the poor win rate, strongly indicates the trading system is seriously flawed, not just "unlucky." The system does not have an edge, or the edge is negative.
4. The "Slow Bleed" vs. "Catastrophic Failure" Profile
The risk profile isn't of catastrophic blow-ups but of a slow, controlled bleed. The individual worst losses are capped off around -98 pips, which isn't horrific by comparison to the profits. It gives the illusion of safety, leading the subscribers to feel risk is kept in check. It's the constant toll of the small-to-medium losses, coupled with the sheer number of trades executed (377 annually), which ends up killing the account, rendering it a "slow bleed" system potentially deadlier in the long run than the volatile.
The Bottom Line
The "Forex Income Forever" channel is the quintessential example of how attractive numbers belie an ultimately loss-making strategy. Although it has an huge subscription base and an apparently favorable Reward/Risk ratio, close examination of its year-long results yields the disturbing conclusion that the channel will lose you money systemically.
The mathematical reality of the situation: the poor 38% winning percentage means the system loses on 62% of trades. Although the 81 pip average winning trade far outweighs the 65 pip average loss, this doesn't even come close to compensating for the sheer volume of losses. Our full-year data simulation proves it this way, and it equated to the disastrous loss of just under 5,500 pips, costing -107 pips weekly.
Our Rating: Bad
This channel is not just "in a drawdown"; it's showing an enduring, long-term failure. Mathematically, the strategy is bound to fail, and the data confirms it has done so consistently for the better part of one year. Any subscriber to these signals has suffered an enduring "slow bleed" of their capital.
Verdict: Run the other way. You'll find no revenue here, just the express ticket toForex Poverty Forever.
