Forexero - Forex Signals Telegram Channel Review. Verified Trading Statistics & Results in 2025-2026
- Best Forex Signals Analyst & Expert

- 2 days ago
- 3 min read

Telegram Channel Overview
Channel Name: Forexero - Forex Signals
Full Years of Operation: 4
Number of Subscribers: 75807
Trading Style: day trading Trading Sessions: New York and Lodon

Free Signals: 151
Win Rate: 38%
Period: 12.08.2025 - 12.08.2026
Pips of Profit: -7,291
Free Signals Backtesting & Reviews
Average Profit per Signal: 20 pips
Markets: GOLD
Average Holding Time: 8 hours
Average Profit a Week: -140 pips
Number of Signals: 0-1 a day
Signals Statistics
Month | Signals | Wins | Losses | Win % | Total Pips |
Aug 2025 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 35% | -640 |
Sep 2025 | 21 | 8 | 13 | 38% | -620 |
Oct 2025 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 37% | -580 |
Nov 2025 | 20 | 8 | 12 | 40% | -560 |
Dec 2025 | 18 | 7 | 11 | 39% | -520 |
Jan 2026 | 21 | 8 | 13 | 38% | -620 |
Feb 2026 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 37% | -580 |
Mar 2026 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 35% | -640 |
Apr 2026 | 21 | 8 | 13 | 38% | -620 |
May 2026 | 20 | 8 | 12 | 40% | -560 |
Jun 2026 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 37% | -580 |
Jul 2026 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 35% | -640 |
Aug 2026 (to 12th) | 6 | 2 | 4 | 33% | -200 |
TOTAL | 244 | 93 | 151 | 38% | -7,291 |
Best Free Signals
XAU/USD | XAU/USD | XAU/USD | XAU/USD |
+47 pips | +41 pips | +38 pips | +35 pips |
Worst Free Signals
XAU/USD | XAU/USD | XAU/USD | XAU/USD |
-189 pips | -172 pips | -158 pips | -143 pips |
Key Statistics Insights:
1. The Winning Rate is a "Mirage"
Though the channel has 38% of winning trades (which seems to be an impressive number), every week is still profitable for the market. Why? Because the average value of losses for losing trades exceeds 3 times the average value of profits for winning trades. In other words, despite the fact that the system is "right" more than one-third of the time, those rare large losses erase most of the small winnings. One loss (-189 pips) erases the value of nearly 10 wins (+20 pips).
2. Losing All Months of One Year Without Exceptions
During the whole year (from August 2025 to August 2026), there wasn't any profitable month. The amount of losses per month varied from -520 pips to -640 pips, which means that there was a "subscription" paid for every month to the market.
3. The Best Trade Is Far from Recovering from the Worst Trade
The highest amount of profit in all of the trades done during the year was +47 pips. The largest loss in all trades done during the year was -189 pips. The size of the worst trade exceeded the size of the best one by 250%. It means that the trader needs to make 4 profitable trades just to recover from one loss.
4. The Process of Weekly Bleeding is Inevitable and Predictable
On average, the channel loses about 140 pips per week (or approximately -28 pips per trading day). In other words, after one year of following the signals, the balance will constantly decrease. Moreover, there weren't any "recovery weeks."
The Bottom Line
On the face of it, Forexero can be taken for a reliable channel – being founded in 2016 and having over 75,000 subscribers. In reality, though, the stats of the channel demonstrate that the service does not provide a profitable trading activity, and even worse, it is a channel that destroys money instead of generating any.
Firstly, the channel works exclusively in the direction GOLD using the sessions of London and New York with a signal of 0-1 trades daily and an average open time of 8 hours. Though the win rate (38%) seems to be decent enough, the reward/risk ratio (0.33) is the most crucial flaw of the channel. The winners bring a positive result of +20 pips, while the losers give -60 pips on average, which means one loss destroys the results of three wins.
The outcome of the channel is consistent enough – each month of the past year was finished with a negative number of pips, which equals to -140 pips on average per week. One could see that the best result of one single trade (+47 pips) does not even manage to pay off one of the worst (-189 pips).
In general, the use of the signals would make a trader lose more than $7,000 annually in case of a usage of standard lot.
Our Rating: Bad
Final verdict: Do Not Try It!


