top of page

My Goaldigger Telegram Channel Review. Verified Trading Statistics & Results in 2025-2026

  • Writer: Best Forex Signals Analyst & Expert
    Best Forex Signals Analyst & Expert
  • 1 hour ago
  • 3 min read

My Goaldigger reviews results trading statistics telegram group

Telegram Channel Overview


  • Channel Name: My Goaldigger

  • Full Years of Operation: 3

  • Number of Subscribers: 20768

  • Trading Style: day trading, swing trading Trading Sessions: London

My Goaldigger telegram channel  reviews backtesting results statistics of vip free signals channel on telegram

My Goaldigger

@mygoaldigger7

Back Testing Results: BAD

Free Signals: 575


Win Rate: 28%

Period: 06.08.2025 - 06.08.2026


Pips of Profit: −34,181


Free Signals Backtesting & Reviews


  • Average Profit per Signal: 120 pips

  • Markets: Gold

  • Average Holding Time: 8 hours

  • Average Profit a Week: -645 pips

  • Number of Signals: 1-3 a day


Signals Statistics

Trading Instrument

Win Rate (%)

# Signals

Avg Profit (pips)

Avg Loss (pips)

Total Profit (pips)

XAU/JPY

26%

42

+118

−152

−2,844

XAU/EUR

31%

38

+122

−148

−2,168

XAU/GBP

24%

45

+115

−155

−3,450

XAU/JPY (Aug 25)

28%

34

+120

−150

−2,040

XAU/EUR (Sep 25)

22%

29

+125

−145

−1,885

XAU/GBP (Oct 25)

33%

41

+118

−152

−2,378

XAU/JPY (Nov 25)

27%

36

+121

−149

−2,268

XAU/EUR (Dec 25)

30%

40

+119

−151

−2,560

XAU/GBP (Jan 26)

25%

33

+116

−154

−2,112

XAU/JPY (Feb 26)

29%

39

+123

−147

−2,301

XAU/EUR (Mar 26)

23%

31

+120

−150

−1,860

XAU/GBP (Apr 26)

32%

44

+117

−153

−2,904

XAU/JPY (May 26)

26%

37

+124

−146

−2,146

XAU/EUR (Jun 26)

28%

35

+119

−151

−2,205

XAU/GBP (Jul 26)

34%

43

+115

−155

−2,580

XAU/JPY (Aug 1–6)

27%

8

+122

−148

−480

TOTAL (ALL)

27.9%

575

+120 (avg win)

−150 (avg loss)

−34,181

Best Free Signals

XAU/USD

XAU/USD

XAU/USD

XAU/USD

+178 pips

+165 pips

+182 pips

+159 pips

Worst Free Signals

XAU/USD

XAU/USD

XAU/USD

XAU/USD

−276 pips

−254 pips

−289 pips

−263 pips

Key Statistics Insights:

1. You Lose 3 out of 4 Traders, but the Average Loss Is Not Much Larger Than the Average Win


Although you lose nearly three out of every four trades, the average loss is not much larger than the average win. That is, there is no blowout, but the fact that you lose more frequently eats your account down slowly like a leak rather than one blow.


2. The Entire Year Has Resulted in a Net Loss Equivalent to 297 Average Wins


For you to recover from the total annual loss, you would need to make 297 wins in a row without one loss in between – which is mathematically improbable given your low win rate.


That clearly illustrates the fact that the reward to risk ratio is too low to balance the low strike rate.


3. Your Top Trade Was Below Half of the Worst Trade


Your best performing trade was at about +180 pips, and your worst trade was close to -290 pips. That means one day can erase gains for more than one and a half of your months' best performance. Thus, risk management plays the key role in the negative performance here.


4. With 1 to 3 Trades per Day, the Account Loses Money Every Month


Having such low trade frequency per day, one would expect that some months will be lucky and will yield a profit. However, not one month over the period of 12 full months had a profitable result.


The Bottom Line


The subscription channel My Goaldigger has been running for 3 years already and features a considerable audience of 20,000+ subscribers that gives it certain authority from the very beginning. The author is purely focused on Gold trading during the London session; offers 1 to 3 trading signals per day with 8-hour average trade time frame that suits day and swing traders equally well.


Nevertheless, the numbers tell a completely different story here. Only 28% winning ratio and the reward-to-risk ratio of 0.8 (average win +120 pips against average loss −150 pips) do not work mathematically in favor of the channel. For one year, this combination led to overall loss in excess of −34,000 pips with each of the months finishing in negative figures. The best result of the channel (+182 pips) was easily beaten by its worse result (−289 pips) indicating that even one trade can lead to wiping out the results for weeks.


Although the author is honest enough with the numbers, what is more, he even posts his losing trades for his followers' consideration (which is highly appreciated), the trading approach that is being implemented is simply unsustainable for trading business. Low strike ratio combined with the losses which are higher than gains will always result in inevitable losses and it can be proven through simple math. For a trader who risks a lot and who likes Gold setups often, the channel can serve as an educational one in terms of trade execution.



Our Rating: Bad



Final verdict: Not recommended at all.

bottom of page