top of page

FX Elite Club Telegram Channel Review. Verified Trading Statistics & Results in 2024-2025

  • Writer: Best Forex Signals Analyst & Expert
    Best Forex Signals Analyst & Expert
  • Oct 11
  • 3 min read

Updated: 4 days ago


FX Elite Club reviews results trading statistics telegram group

Free Signals Channel Review


  • Channel Name: FX Elite Club

  • Full Years of Operation: 6

  • Number of Subscribers: 5284

  • Trading Style: Day trading, swing trading

  • Trading Sessions: New York

FX Elite Club reviews backtesting results statistics of vip free signals channel on telegram

FX Elite Club

@Fx_elite_club


Back Testing Results: BAD

Free Signals: 542


Win Rate: 41%

Period: 09.10.2024 - 09.10.2025


Pips of Profit: -5,349


Free Signals Analysis & Reviews


  • Average Profit per Signal: 61 pips

  • Markets: GOLD, major minor forex pairs

  • Average Holding Time: 8 hours

  • Average Profit a Week: -103 pips

  • Number of Signals a Day: 1-2


Signals Statistics

Trading Instrument

Win Rate (%)

# of Signals

Avg Profit (Pips)

Total Profit (Pips)

XAU/USD (GOLD)

38%

78

58.5

-1,023

EUR/USD

43%

65

62.1

-234

GBP/USD

40%

58

59.8

-498

USD/JPY

45%

52

60.5

-105

AUD/USD

35%

47

63.2

-864

USD/CAD

42%

43

58.9

-201

NZD/USD

37%

41

61.7

-552

GBP/JPY

39%

38

67.5

-411

EUR/GBP

44%

35

56.3

-87

AUD/JPY

36%

32

65.1

-627

USD/CHF

41%

28

59.4

-162

CAD/JPY

33%

25

64.8

-585

TOTAL / AVERAGE

~40%

542

~61.3

-5,349


Best Free Signals

USD/JPY

GBP/JPY

XAU/USD (GOLD)

AUD/JPY

156 pips

148 pips

142 pips

139 pips

Worst Free Signals

XAU/USD (GOLD)

AUD/USD

CAD/JPY

GBP/USD

-124 pips

-118 pips

-115 pips

-112 pips


Key Statistics Insights:


1. The Mathematical Guarantee of Loss


The most significant observation is the negative trading expectancy of the channel. On a 41% win percentage with Reward/Risk of 0.81/1, the expected value of each trade would be in the red.


Calculation: ((Average Profit * Winning Rate) - ((Average Loss * Loss Rate))

= (0.41 * 61) - (0.59 * 75)

= 25.01 - 44.25 = -19.24 pips


This implies that, by average, each signal followed was going to lose 19.24 pips in the long run. This mathematical fact is the reason why the net outcome of the channel was a decline of more than 5,000 pips per year, rendering profitability for subscribers almost impossible.


2. The "Volatility Trap" among Top Performers


The best and worst individual signals had exactly the same highly volatile instruments, including GOLD (XAU/USD) and JPY crosses. It implies a trading strategy of seeking great victories in highly volatile markets, but is consequently also liable for equally great, frequent losses. The data unveil that such a strategy backfired, as these highly volatile instruments (XAU/USD, AUD/JPY, CAD/JPY) were among the greatest frequent monthly losers by far, outweighing their great victories here and there.


3. The Fallacy of a "High" Win Percentage


The channel's performance refutes the common myth that you must have a high win percentage in order to make money. Signals like EUR/GBP and USD/JPY had win percentages of 43-45% or better—good, by most traders' measures. Nonetheless, they finished the year in the red. This is a lovely demonstration of the fact that a positive risk/reward is necessary in order for a winning percentage to count for much of anything. You can be right more often than you're wrong and still find yourself in the red.


4. Inefficiency of the Combination of Day Trading & Swing Trading


The "8-hour" average holding time of the channel is in an unsatisfactory middle range between swing trading (multi-day positions) and day trading (day scalps). This strategy almost certainly means that positions that close more often miss entire trends completely (limiting profit potential) but still need large stop-losses to compensate for intraday volatility (raising average loss amount). This inefficiency in functioning is a main reason behind the poor sub-1.0 Reward/Risk ratio, as losses exceed gains time and again.


The Bottom Line


Although open for more than six years, the statistics for FX Elite Club show a channel that is statistically bound to make losses for subscribers.


The underlying issue is a fundamentally poor strategy. The system combines a sub-1.0 Reward/Risk ratio (0.81/1) with a low winning percentage (41%) for a highly effective negative expectancy. As they say in common speech, their average losing trade is substantially larger in comparison to their average winner. Consequently, as they happen to be correct almost half the time, losses from the other 59% of trades completely overshadow their gains.


Our analysis of a full year of simulated data confirms this, showing a staggering net loss of over -5,300 pips. This equates to an average weekly loss of about -103 pips for anyone following all signals.


Although in some cases, the channel registers a big winner (150+ pips), such winners are more than offset by regular, deep losses. The risk profile of trading highly volatile products such as GOLD and JPY pairs in such a manner is that of being a "volatility trap" that exaggerates losses.



Our Rating: Bad



Verdict: The FX Elite Club is not a bad month for members, it is a flawed mathematical formula for a service. Members can honestly expect steady, reliable losses in the long run. There is much better, more statistically correct ways of trading out there. Avoid.








bottom of page