GARY GOLD TRADER Telegram Channel Review. Verified Trading Statistics & Results in 2024-2025
- Best Forex Signals Analyst & Expert
- Sep 20
- 4 min read
Updated: 4 days ago
Free Signals Channel Review
Channel Name: GARY GOLD TRADER
Full Years of Operation: 3
Number of Subscribers: 192700
Trading Style: Day trading, scalping
Trading Sessions: London and New York
Free Signals: 517
Win Rate: 15%
Period: 16.09.2024 - 16.09.2025
Pips of Profit: -22,053
Free Signals Analysis & Reviews
Average Profit per Signal: 50 pips
Markets: Gold
Average Holding Time: 8 hours
Average Profit a Week: -423 pips
Number of Signals a Day: 2
Signals Statistics
Trading Instrument | Win Rate (%) | # of Signals | Avg. Profit (Pips) | Total Profit (Pips) |
XAU/USD | ||||
Sep 2024 | 18% | 44 | 51.5 | -1,734 |
Oct 2024 | 14% | 43 | 49.2 | -1,848 |
Nov 2024 | 9% | 42 | 52.8 | -2,203 |
Dec 2024 | 20% | 40 | 48.1 | -1,280 |
Jan 2025 | 16% | 45 | 50.5 | -1,948 |
Feb 2025 | 11% | 41 | 49.7 | -2,038 |
Mar 2025 | 13% | 44 | 51.2 | -1,965 |
Apr 2025 | 17% | 43 | 50.8 | -1,645 |
May 2025 | 15% | 44 | 49.5 | -1,842 |
Jun 2025 | 14% | 42 | 52.1 | -1,812 |
Jul 2025 | 19% | 46 | 48.9 | -1,679 |
Aug 2025 | 12% | 44 | 50.3 | -2,059 |
12-Month Total | ~15% | 517 | ~50.4 | -22,053 |
Best Free Signals
XAU/USD | XAU/USD | XAU/USD | XAU/USD |
+132 pips | +121 pips | +115 pips | +108 pips |
Worst Free Signals
XAU/USD | XAU/USD | XAU/USD | XAU/USD |
-98 pips | -95 pips | -92 pips | -90 pips |
Key Statistics Insights:
1. Catastrophic Negative Expectancy
The performance of the channel is not merely poor but consistently and mathematically disastrous. The aggregated statistics present a highly negative expected value per trade.
Calculation: (Win Rate * Avg. Win) - (Loss Rate * Avg. Loss) = (0.15 * 50) - (0.85 * 60) = 7.5 - 51 = -43.5 pips.
Insight: This is akin to each individual signal mathematically expected to generate a loss of 43.5 pips long term. This is the underlying reason behind the whopping 22,000+ pip loss each year. The channel has in addition to a low percentage of winners broken risk management (R/R < 1) at its very foundation.
2. The Big Wins Illusion vs. The Consistent Reality
Whereas best trades produced in excess of 120 pips profit, these were statistical outliers that gave a false sense of probability.
Insight: The four "best" signs (+132, +121, +115, +108) averaged a 119-pip gain. The four "worst" signs (-98, -95, -92, -90), on the other hand, averaged a loss of -93.75 pips. This induces positive skew (119/93.75 ≈ 1.27), emphasized by the channel. But in real life, such large winners are so unusual (15% of the time) to be completely overshadowed by the frequent smaller losses 85% of the time.
3. Extreme Consistency in Losing
The month-to-month results show an alarming absence of any profitable time frame, having no apparent skill or advantage.
Insight: For 12 consecutive months and 517 combined signals, no month closed in net profit. The best of the months (December 2024) still closed down by -1,280 pips. That is evidence the system is not just undergoing an abnormally long stretch of poor performance but is fundamentally flawed and in the long term constantly transferring funds of subscribers to the market.
4. The Cost of Subscription
Converting the pips into monetary value will show how much money a subscriber is likely to lose.
Assumption: A conservative estimate of swapping a mini lot (0.1 size) in which 1 pip ≈ $1.
Calculation: -22,053 pips * $1/pip = -$22,053 per year.
Insight: Chasing these "free" leads would have been costly at an average monthly subscription rate of a user well in excess of $1,800, plus likely spreads or commissions. This starkly redefines the value proposition of the channel from "free" to "very costly."
The Bottom Line
This channel is not only non-profitable, but a highly advanced and reliable wealth-destruction instrument. The subscribers using its signals would have faced absolute mathematical certainty in catastrophic losses.
Performance Analysis:
Over the past twelve months, the channel issued 517 alerts, with a total loss of over 22,000 pips. That is a monthly loss of $1,800+ even at a minuscule scale of operation. The fundamental issue is a fatal combination of an extremely poor 15% success ratio and a reward-to-risk ratio of 0.7, so losses are unequivocally larger than rewards. The result is an overwhelmingly negative expectancy of -43.5 pips and loss.
Major Highlights:
No Successful Months: The channel never recorded a profitable net trades month in a completed twelve-month period of operation, evidence of an absolute inability to achieve a profitable advantage in trades.
Misleading Highlights: Occasionally large victories (e.g., +132 pips) are highlighted, but these are exceptions found very infrequently and wholly over-balanced by typical losses.
"Free" is an Illusion: The actual cost of these "free" alerts is massive and is essentially a monthly definite withdrawal from the subscriber's trading account.
Our Rating: Bad
Decision: Steer clear of it at all costs. This is the epitome of why subscriber base and operational time are poor determinants of success. Its approach is gravely wrong, and to follow it is the fiscal equivalent of entering into a monthly subscription to lose money.
