top of page

GOLD SIGNALS SCALPING Telegram Channel Review. Verified Trading Statistics & Results in 2025-2026

  • Writer: Best Forex Signals Analyst & Expert
    Best Forex Signals Analyst & Expert
  • Jun 3
  • 3 min read

GOLD SIGNALS SCALPING reviews results trading statistics telegram group

Telegram Channel Overview


  • Channel Name: GOLD SIGNALS SCALPING

  • Full Years of Operation: 1

  • Number of Subscribers: 33860

  • Trading Style: scalping Trading Sessions: London and Asia

GOLD SIGNALS SCALPING telegram channel  reviews backtesting results statistics of vip free signals channel on telegram

Free Signals: 250


Win Rate: 37%

Period: 02.06.2025 - 02.06.2026


Pips of Profit: −32,071


Free Signals Backtesting & Reviews


  • Average Profit per Signal: 85 pips

  • Markets: Gold

  • Average Holding Time: 8 hours

  • Average Profit a Week: –617 pips

  • Number of Signals: 1 a day


Signals Statistics

Trading Instrument

Win Rate (%)

Number of Signals

Total Profit (pips)

XAU/USD (Gold)

36%

21

−2,405

XAU/USD (Gold)

38%

22

−2,680

XAU/USD (Gold)

34%

20

−3,010

XAU/USD (Gold)

37%

21

−2,850

XAU/USD (Gold)

35%

20

−3,145

XAU/USD (Gold)

39%

22

−1,970

XAU/USD (Gold)

33%

19

−3,400

XAU/USD (Gold)

37%

21

−2,810

XAU/USD (Gold)

36%

22

−2,990

XAU/USD (Gold)

40%

21

−1,605

XAU/USD (Gold)

36%

20

−2,950

XAU/USD (Gold)

38%

21

−2,255

Best Free Signals

XAU/USD

XAU/USD

XAU/USD

XAU/USD

+92 pips

+88 pips

+85 pips

+81 pips

Worst Free Signals

XAU/USD

XAU/USD

XAU/USD

XAU/USD

−245 pips

−238 pips

−230 pips

−225 pips

Key Statistics Insights:


1. There Is No Way You Will Win Every Week


On average, the result per week is −615 pips.

In other words, even if you use all the signals from this channel for just one week, you will definitely end up with a loss. It is not a matter of luck; rather, the probability of such an outcome comes from poor statistics about the channel's win rate and reward-to-risk ratio.


2. One Month Will Be Enough To Undo The Entire Success Of Your Best Signals


During the whole year, the most profitable four trades have brought together only +346 pips.

However, it took only one worst month (−3,400 pips) to undo the results of more than 9 months of "best signals only." However, there were very few such signals available.


3. Losses Are Almost 3 Times Bigger Than Wins


Without any calculations, it is clearly seen that losses outnumbered profits considerably.

Even with a 50% win rate, it would be impossible to make a profit. But the reality is worse since only 37% of trades were profitable.


4. During One Year, This Trader Lost More Than 30,000 Pips


It corresponds roughly to the entire length of an ordinary football pitch.

Despite 33k+ subscribers who have been receiving signals daily, the trading approach itself is faulty. No signals can help you compensate for a negative reward-to-risk ratio and low win rate.

The Bottom Line


Upon initial impression, the channel looks like a good catch, as the number of subscribers exceeds 33,000 and there is an almost-daily signal for Gold. Still, taking a closer look at the statistics shows that the trading system was created by someone who wanted you to lose money.


Though the channel calls itself a "scalping" one, its average holding period of 8 hours is incompatible with the scalping style altogether. The fact alone indicates poor knowledge possessed by the creator of the signals.


However, the most striking statistic here is reward to risk ratio of 0.36. In other words, each losing trade will be almost three times bigger than a winning one. With win rate of 37% per month, the result is predictable and predetermined – constant and steady loss.


If following the signals for a year, one can expect to lose −32,071 pips overall, which makes −615 pips weekly. The loss would be higher even if one could make use of the four most profitable signals in a year (+346 pips total).


Our Rating: Bad



Verdict: While the channel offers daily trading signals, it definitely does not offer profits. One will experience a slow and steady loss. Subscription base of 33,860 subscribers does not necessarily mean anything; probably it is a result of attracting newcomers.

bottom of page