MARKET ANALYSIS Telegram Channel Review. Verified Trading Statistics & Results in 2024-2025
- Best Forex Signals Analyst & Expert

- Aug 31
- 3 min read

Free Signals Channel Review
Channel Name: MARKET ANALYSIS
Full Years of Operation: 3
Number of Subscribers: 31006
Trading Style: Swing Trading
Trading Sessions: London, New York

Free Signals: 464
Win Rate: 34%
Period: 28.08.2024 - 28.08.2025
Pips of Profit: -9080
Free Signals Analysis & Reviews
Average Profit per Signal: 95 pips
Markets: Forex Majors, Minors, Gold
Average Holding Time: 8 hours
Average Profit a Week: -175 pips
Number of Signals a Day: 1
Signals Statistics
Trading Instrument | Win Rate % | # of Signals | Avg. Profit (pips) | Total Profit (pips) |
AUD/USD | 29% | 46 | 87 | -1,102 |
EUR/GBP | 31% | 38 | 102 | -868 |
EUR/JPY | 38% | 42 | 110 | -84 |
EUR/USD | 33% | 58 | 98 | -1,244 |
GBP/CAD | 27% | 36 | 121 | -1,044 |
GBP/USD | 36% | 52 | 89 | -692 |
NZD/USD | 30% | 31 | 78 | -719 |
USD/CAD | 32% | 40 | 84 | -808 |
USD/CHF | 35% | 35 | 91 | -525 |
USD/JPY | 37% | 45 | 105 | -315 |
XAU/USD (Gold) | 33% | 41 | 187 | -1,679 |
TOTAL / AVERAGE | 33% | 464 | 104 | -9,080 |
Best Free Signals
XAU/USD | GBP/CAD | EUR/JPY | EUR/USD |
287 pips | 201 pips | 188 pips | 162 pips |
Worst Free Signals
GBP/CAD | EUR/GBP | AUD/USD | XAU/USD |
-121 pips | -118 pips | -115 pips | -210 pips |
Key Statistics Insights:
Historically High Volatility in Gold (XAU/USD) Led to Largest Profits and Losses
The statistics reveal that Gold was both the most destructive and potentially profitable instrument.
Insight: It generated the largest winning signal of the year at a massive +287 pips and the largest losing signal at a loss of -210 pips. This shows how volatile trading Gold is. While the high risk/reward can generate some very nice winning trades, the low percentage of winning trades has the system frequently on the incorrect side of those large moves and makes it the system's biggest loss maker.
Deceptive Reward/Risk Ratio Without a High Win Rate
The channel has a healthy average Win/Risk of 1.4/1 (which means that the average win is 1.4 times larger than the average loss). This isn't working because the win percentage is weak.
Insight: In order to be profitable at a 1.4/1 ratio, a system would need a win percentage of around 42% or more. With only a 34% win percentage, the figures don't quite add up. A classic case of a quality R/R ratio being invalidated by an inability to consistently guess direction correctly. The ratio makes one imagine a quality system, but the win percentage speaks for itself.
MARKET ANALYSIS Signals Review
The "MARKET ANALYSIS" channel has attracted a considerable subscribership within a space of three years by virtue of giving a daily swing trade signal. A statistical examination of its history, however, reveals a consistently losing system that is highly likely to lose subscribers money in the long term.
The Hard Facts:
Continuous Losses: Our monitored one-year performance yielded a total loss of more than 9,000 pips.
Mathematically Deficient: The system has a negative mathematical expectation of -10.6 pips per trade. This translates into each signal that is displayed having a statistical likelihood of losing.
Low Win Rate: A win rate of only 34% means that about 2 out of every 3 trades lose, so it can become a very frustrating experience for followers.
Misleading Ratio: While the advertised 1.4/1 reward-to-risk ratio sounds good, it is completely negated by the abysmally low win rate.
The Bottom Line
This channel is a prime example of why traders must look beyond surface-level statistics. The data conclusively proves that the strategy is systemically flawed across all traded instruments. The channel's long operation and large subscriber count likely stem from the psychological appeal of large, occasional winning trades, which mask the consistent long-term losses.
Our Rating: Bad
Finding: Avoid. Trading from these signals is mathematically identical to slowly bleeding capital. Brokers emphatically suggest seeking out methods of higher positive expectancy instead.


