top of page

MARKET ANALYSIS Telegram Channel Review. Verified Trading Statistics & Results in 2024-2025

  • Writer: Best Forex Signals Analyst & Expert
    Best Forex Signals Analyst & Expert
  • Aug 31
  • 3 min read

market analysis channel reviews results trading statistics telegram group

Free Signals Channel Review


  • Channel Name: MARKET ANALYSIS

  • Full Years of Operation: 3

  • Number of Subscribers: 31006

  • Trading Style: Swing Trading

  • Trading Sessions: London, New York

market analysis reviews backtesting results statistics of vip free signals channel on telegram

MARKET ANALYSIS Signals Channel


@signalsfc


Back Testing Results: BAD

Free Signals: 464


Win Rate: 34%

Period: 28.08.2024 - 28.08.2025


Pips of Profit: -9080


Free Signals Analysis & Reviews


  • Average Profit per Signal: 95 pips

  • Markets: Forex Majors, Minors, Gold

  • Average Holding Time: 8 hours

  • Average Profit a Week: -175 pips

  • Number of Signals a Day: 1


Signals Statistics

Trading Instrument

Win Rate %

# of Signals

Avg. Profit (pips)

Total Profit (pips)

AUD/USD

29%

46

87

-1,102

EUR/GBP

31%

38

102

-868

EUR/JPY

38%

42

110

-84

EUR/USD

33%

58

98

-1,244

GBP/CAD

27%

36

121

-1,044

GBP/USD

36%

52

89

-692

NZD/USD

30%

31

78

-719

USD/CAD

32%

40

84

-808

USD/CHF

35%

35

91

-525

USD/JPY

37%

45

105

-315

XAU/USD (Gold)

33%

41

187

-1,679

TOTAL / AVERAGE

33%

464

104

-9,080

Best Free Signals

XAU/USD

GBP/CAD

EUR/JPY

EUR/USD

287 pips

201 pips

188 pips

162 pips

Worst Free Signals

GBP/CAD

EUR/GBP

AUD/USD

XAU/USD

-121 pips

-118 pips

-115 pips

-210 pips

Key Statistics Insights:


  1. Historically High Volatility in Gold (XAU/USD) Led to Largest Profits and Losses


The statistics reveal that Gold was both the most destructive and potentially profitable instrument.


Insight: It generated the largest winning signal of the year at a massive +287 pips and the largest losing signal at a loss of -210 pips. This shows how volatile trading Gold is. While the high risk/reward can generate some very nice winning trades, the low percentage of winning trades has the system frequently on the incorrect side of those large moves and makes it the system's biggest loss maker.


  1. Deceptive Reward/Risk Ratio Without a High Win Rate


The channel has a healthy average Win/Risk of 1.4/1 (which means that the average win is 1.4 times larger than the average loss). This isn't working because the win percentage is weak.


Insight: In order to be profitable at a 1.4/1 ratio, a system would need a win percentage of around 42% or more. With only a 34% win percentage, the figures don't quite add up. A classic case of a quality R/R ratio being invalidated by an inability to consistently guess direction correctly. The ratio makes one imagine a quality system, but the win percentage speaks for itself.

MARKET ANALYSIS Signals Review


The "MARKET ANALYSIS" channel has attracted a considerable subscribership within a space of three years by virtue of giving a daily swing trade signal. A statistical examination of its history, however, reveals a consistently losing system that is highly likely to lose subscribers money in the long term.


The Hard Facts:


  • Continuous Losses: Our monitored one-year performance yielded a total loss of more than 9,000 pips.


  • Mathematically Deficient: The system has a negative mathematical expectation of -10.6 pips per trade. This translates into each signal that is displayed having a statistical likelihood of losing.


  • Low Win Rate: A win rate of only 34% means that about 2 out of every 3 trades lose, so it can become a very frustrating experience for followers.


  • Misleading Ratio: While the advertised 1.4/1 reward-to-risk ratio sounds good, it is completely negated by the abysmally low win rate.


The Bottom Line


This channel is a prime example of why traders must look beyond surface-level statistics. The data conclusively proves that the strategy is systemically flawed across all traded instruments. The channel's long operation and large subscriber count likely stem from the psychological appeal of large, occasional winning trades, which mask the consistent long-term losses.


Our Rating: Bad



Finding: Avoid. Trading from these signals is mathematically identical to slowly bleeding capital. Brokers emphatically suggest seeking out methods of higher positive expectancy instead.




bottom of page