Market Makers Telegram Channel Review. Verified Trading Statistics & Results in 2025-2026
Telegram Channel Overview
Channel Name: Market Makers
Full Years of Operation: 6
Number of Subscribers: 101744
Trading Style: day trading Trading Sessions: London
Free Signals: 164
Win Rate: 34%
Period: 14.11.2025 - 14.11.2026
Pips of Profit: −2,870
Free Signals Backtesting & Reviews
Average Profit per Signal: 45 pips
Markets: Gold
Average Holding Time: 8 hours
Average Profit a Week: -563 pips
Number of Signals: 0-1 a day
Signals Statistics
Trading Instrument | Win Rate % | # Signals | Avg Profit / Signal (pips) | Total Profit (pips) |
GOLD (Dec 2025) | 33.3% | 15 | −19.7 | −295 |
GOLD (Jan 2026) | 35.7% | 14 | −13.6 | −190 |
GOLD (Feb 2026) | 30.8% | 13 | −26.2 | −340 |
GOLD (Mar 2026) | 37.5% | 16 | −8.4 | −135 |
GOLD (Apr 2026) | 28.6% | 14 | −32.9 | −460 |
GOLD (May 2026) | 40.0% | 15 | +1.0 | +15 |
GOLD (Jun 2026) | 33.3% | 12 | −19.2 | −230 |
GOLD (Jul 2026) | 31.3% | 16 | −24.4 | −390 |
GOLD (Aug 2026) | 35.3% | 17 | −14.7 | −250 |
GOLD (Sep 2026) | 26.7% | 15 | −38.3 | −575 |
GOLD (Oct 2026) | 36.4% | 11 | −10.9 | −120 |
GOLD (Nov 2026, to 14th) | 33.3% | 6 | −20.0 | −120 |
YEAR TOTAL / AVG | 33.6% | 164 | −17.5 | −2,870 |
Best Free Signals
GOLD | GOLD | GOLD | GOLD |
145 pips | 138 pips | 127 pips | 119 pips |
Worst Free Signals
GOLD | GOLD | GOLD | GOLD |
-186 pips | -174 pips | -163 pips | -151 pips |
Key Statistics Insights:
1. The channel must be winning almost twice as much as it actually does just to be breakeven.
Since the channel works with a reward-to-risk ratio equal to 0.45, it wins 45 pips for each 100 pips lost. In other words, losers give away more than twice as much money as winners bring in. The channel should be winning two of three trades just to balance out. However, it wins one of three. And the difference between these two ratios explains everything about the account.
2. Having a positive month out of twelve doesn't mean anything – it is just noise.
Only May 2026 showed a positive result (+15 pips). But all other months were losing months – September, in particular, losing almost 575 pips. One good month out of twelve is the result of variance hiding the negative result rather than skill recovering.
3. The worst losses are always worse than the best wins – this is how the channel operates.
The best individual results of the channel are around +145 pips. At the same time, the worst ones go as high as -186 pips. The channel's best results simply cannot offset its worst results. This is not the case of having a few unlucky trades – this is the math behind the channel with negative expectancy.
4. Low activity does not save the channel from losses.
Even though the channel operates with a low number of signals per day (around 0.66), it still shows a weekly negative result equal to about 55 pips.
The Bottom Line
Market Makers has been running six years and has built a following of over 100,000 subscribers — but longevity and audience size are not the same as profitability. The numbers tell a much less flattering story.
The core problem is the reward/risk ratio. At 0.45, the channel risks 100 pips to make 45. A system like that needs roughly a two-in-three win rate just to break even. Market Makers wins about one in three. That single mismatch guarantees losses regardless of how good any individual call looks — and it's confirmed by the year's results: roughly −2,870 pips across twelve months, with eleven of twelve months in the red. The lone positive month, May 2026, scraped together +15 pips.
Volume is low, but the bleed is steady. At 0–1 signals a day, often zero, subscribers aren't being spammed — but they are losing roughly 55 pips a week on average. Even the channel's best trades (around +145 pips) don't outweigh its worst (around −186 pips). The losses aren't a bad streak; they're the arithmetic.
What it does right: it's free, it trades a single clear instrument (GOLD) in a defined session (London), and it doesn't overtrade. Those are small mercies, not reasons to follow it.
Our Rating: Bad
Final verdict: Six years and 100,000 subscribers don't make a losing system profitable. With a ~34% win rate against a 0.45 reward/risk ratio, Market Makers is a textbook example of negative expectancy — steady, predictable losses dressed up as a free service. Use it as a case study in why risk/reward matters, not as a source of signals.
