top of page

Millionaire Recruit Telegram Channel Review. Verified Trading Statistics & Results in 2025-2026

  • Writer: Best Forex Signals Analyst & Expert
    Best Forex Signals Analyst & Expert
  • May 30
  • 3 min read

Millionaire Recruit reviews results trading statistics telegram group

Telegram Channel Overview


  • Channel Name: Millionaire Recruit

  • Full Years of Operation: 4

  • Number of Subscribers: 15824

  • Trading Style: day trading, swing trading, scalping Trading Sessions: New York

Millionaire Recruit telegram channel  reviews backtesting results statistics of vip free signals channel on telegram

Millionaire Recruit

@MillionaireRecruit


Back Testing Results: BAD

Free Signals: 354


Win Rate: 29%

Period: 30.05.2025 - 30.05.2026


Pips of Profit: −10,809


Free Signals Backtesting & Reviews


  • Average Profit per Signal: 95 pips

  • Markets: Gold

  • Average Holding Time: 8 hours

  • Average Profit a Week: –207 pips

  • Number of Signals: 0-2 a day


Signals Statistics

Trading Instrument (Month/Year)

Win Rate (%)

Number of Signals

Avg Profit per Signal (pips)

Total Profit (pips)

XAU/USD (Jun 2025)

30%

28

97

−812

XAU/USD (Jul 2025)

28%

32

94

−1,020

XAU/USD (Aug 2025)

31%

30

96

−828

XAU/USD (Sep 2025)

27%

29

93

−1,025

XAU/USD (Oct 2025)

32%

31

95

−732

XAU/USD (Nov 2025)

26%

28

92

−1,080

XAU/USD (Dec 2025)

29%

30

94

−882

XAU/USD (Jan 2026)

28%

33

95

−1,025

XAU/USD (Feb 2026)

30%

26

96

−689

XAU/USD (Mar 2026)

27%

31

93

−1,103

XAU/USD (Apr 2026)

29%

29

94

−867

XAU/USD (May 2026 – to 30th)

31%

27

97

−746

Best Free Signals

Gold

Gold

Gold

Gold

187 pips

163 pips

142 pips

128 pips

Worst Free Signals

Gold

Gold

Gold

Gold

-98 pips

-102 pips

-99 pips

-101 pips

Key Statistics Insights:


1. A trader loses money almost every single week


Despite occasional winning trades, the channel generates a negative average weekly return of over 200 pips. This means a follower would have lost pips in the vast majority of weeks — with only occasional positive weeks that are too small to offset the string of losses.


2. The best winning trade is barely better than the average losing trade is bad


The top winning signal (+187 pips) is less than twice the size of a typical losing trade (−100 pips). Since losing trades happen more than twice as often as winning trades (71% loss rate), even the best month cannot rescue the overall performance.


3. Losing trades are extremely consistent, but winning trades are not


Nearly every losing signal falls between −98 and −102 pips — tightly clustered around the average loss. By contrast, winning trades range from +95 pips to +187 pips, meaning profits are unpredictable, but losses are guaranteed and uniform.


4. Following this channel for one year guarantees a loss, regardless of trade size


Even with perfect execution and no fees, the total annual loss exceeds −10,000 pips. To break even, the channel would need to more than double its win rate or increase the average winning trade to over 240 pips — neither of which has happened in four years of operation.

The Bottom Line


At first glance, four years of operation and nearly 16,000 subscribers suggest credibility. However, the trading statistics tell a very different story.


The Good (Very Little)


  • The channel is consistent — just not in a good way. Losses are predictable and uniform.

  • Signals are infrequent (0–2 per day), so you won't blow your account quickly.


The Bad


With a 29% win rate and a risk/reward ratio of 0.95 (losing more on losers than you gain on winners), this channel is mathematically designed to lose money. The average winning trade nets 95 pips, while the average losing trade costs 100 pips — and losing trades happen more than twice as often as winners.


The Ugly


Over one year, a follower would lose approximately −10,800 pips. That means:

  • Negative every single week (around −200 pips weekly)

  • Best winning trade (+187 pips) doesn't even cover two average losses (−200 pips total)

  • Losses are tight and predictable (−98 to −102 pips), but winners are rare and inconsistent



Our Rating: Bad



Verdict: Millionaire Recruit may have an ambitious name, but the results are those of a recruit losing money for four straight years. Even with free signals, the cost in pips — and trading psychology after constant losses — is far too high.

bottom of page