Octa Analytics Telegram Channel Review. Verified Trading Statistics & Results in 2024-2025
- Best Forex Signals Analyst & Expert
- Sep 24
- 3 min read
Updated: 4 days ago
Free Signals Channel Review
Channel Name: Octa Analytics
Full Years of Operation: 5
Number of Subscribers: 133091
Trading Style: Day trading, scalping
Trading Sessions: London
Free Signals: 1,203
Win Rate: 41%
Period: 01.10.2024 - 24.09.2025
Pips of Profit: -5,486
Free Signals Analysis & Reviews
Average Profit per Signal: 33 pips
Markets: Forex majors, gold, bitcoin, ethereum
Average Holding Time: 8 hours
Average Profit a Week: -105.5 pips
Number of Signals a Day: 3
Signals Statistics
Trading Instrument | Win Rate (%) | # of Signals | Avg. Profit (Pips) | Total Pips (PnL) |
EUR/USD | 42% | 215 | +31 | -455 |
GBP/USD | 38% | 198 | +34 | -1,102 |
USD/JPY | 45% | 185 | +29 | +18 |
AUD/USD | 40% | 172 | +32 | -618 |
XAU/USD (Gold) | 39% | 156 | +36 | -1,092 |
BTC/USD | 37% | 142 | +41 | -1,892 |
ETH/USD | 43% | 135 | +38 | -345 |
TOTAL (All Instruments) | ~41% | 1,203 | Avg: +34 | -5,486 |
Best Free Signals
BTC/USD | XAU/USD (Gold) | GBP/USD | EUR/USD |
+142 pips | +118 pips | +96 pips | +89 pips |
Worst Free Signals
GBP/USD | XAU/USD (Gold) | BTC/USD | EUR/USD |
-127 pips | -119 pips | -115 pips | -98 pips |
Key Statistics Insights:
1. The Fatal Flaw in the Strategy: Negative Expectancy
The single most important observation is the negative expectancy of the channel of roughly -4.56 pips per trade. What this indicates is that each and every signal entered resulted, on average, at a loss. It's a straightforward mathematical fact of a win rate (41%) being too low to achieve a 1:1 Risk/Reward ratio. To become profitable with a 1:1 R/R, a system requires a win rate firmly above 50%. It's this one number that best sums up why the gross annual result turned out as a loss of more than 5,400 pips.
2. Highly Volatile Instruments Aggravated Losses
Whereas all instruments closed the year with net losses (except for USD/JPY, which was nearly flat), they're most volatile of the lot generated highest damages. BTC/USD generated the highest damage (-1,892 pips), and XAU/USD (Gold) followed (-1,092 pips). It suggests that the scalping/day-trading approach of the channel might not hold out well with the high risk of trading with these assets and translate their high price fluctuations into high damages often instead of the other way around.
3. Best and Worst Trades Reveal Asymmetric Risk
In spite of the best and worse individual trade comparison revealing an asymmetry operating against the subscriber:
Best Win: +142 pips (BTC/USD)
Worst Loss: -127 pips (GBP/USD)
The prospective loss of a bad trade is almost as great as a gain of the best possible trade. But since losses materialize 59% of the time, this almost a 1:1 prospective is a disaster. A trader feels the agony of a near-maximum loss more frequently than he feels the ecstasy of a maximum win.
4. Illusion of Activity as Opposed to Profitability
The channel has a high number of signals (some 15 per week or 1,203 per year), conveying a picture of active and sophisticated analysis. But high activity only serves to build the effect of the negative expectancy. What the subscriber gets instead of "more opportunities" are more frequent losses. Evidence is that continuous activity with an invalid strategy is a guarantee of making loses with time and not a path of profitability.
The Bottom Line
Following a rigorous examination of one year of backtested performance records, the Octa Analytics signal channel presents itself as a high-risk, technically unsound service likely to incur a net loss among subscribers.
The core problem is simple and fatal: the strategy has a negative expectancy. With a win rate of only 41% and a 1:1 risk/reward ratio, every signal placed, on average, loses about 4.5 pips. Over a year of frequent trading (3 signals per day), this compounds into a staggering net loss of over 5,400 pips.
Key Reasons to Avoid:
Guaranteed Long-Term Loss: Figures don't lie. Below a 50% win rate with a 1:1 R/R results in consistent bankroll erosion.
Volatility penalizes subscribers: The biggest losses are from the highest volume volatile assets of the channel like Bitcoin and Gold, reflecting poor risk management during significant market fluctuations.
Volume Over Profitability: With a high volume of incoming signals (1,200+ per year), one gets a false sense of opportunities while actually increasing one's losses.
Despite the channel being operational for 5 years and commanding a large following, such a period of time and popularity are no indicators of quality. Evidence, from the data at our disposal, is very straightforward that Octa Analytics is a losing service as per subscribers.
Our Rating: Bad
Recommendation: Avoid. Subscription to this channel translates as paying a systematic way of losing money in the markets.
