School Of Trades Telegram Channel Review. Verified Trading Statistics & Results in 2024-2025
- Best Forex Signals Analyst & Expert
- Nov 26, 2025
- 3 min read
Free Signals Channel Review
Channel Name: School Of Trades
Full Years of Operation: 4
Number of Subscribers: 155132
Trading Style: day trading Trading Sessions: New York
Free Signals: 91
Win Rate: 38%
Period: 25.11.2024 - 25.11.2025
Pips of Profit: -11,752
Free Signals Analysis & Reviews
Average Profit per Signal: 75 pips
Markets: Forex major, minor pairs, Gold
Average Holding Time: 8 hours
Average Profit a Week: -226 pips
Number of Signals a Day: 1-2 signals a week
Signals Statistics
Trading Instrument | Win Rate (%) | # of Signals | Total P&L (Pips) |
XAU/USD | 27% | 26 | -9,599 |
EUR/USD | 39% | 33 | -782 |
GBP/USD | 29% | 23 | -896 |
AUD/CAD | 14% | 9 | -475 |
GRAND TOTAL | 30% | 91 | -11,752 |
Best Free Signals
XAU/USD | GBP/USD | EUR/USD | AUD/CAD |
685 pips | 82 pips | 79 pips | 61 pips |
Worst Free Signals
XAU/USD | XAU/USD | GBP/USD | EUR/USD |
-845 pips | -835 pips | -96 pips | -88 pips |
Key Statistics Insights:
1. Catastrophic Negative Expect
Mathematical expectation of the channel’s strategy is very negative. Given the win probability of ~30% and the average loss (272 pips), almost twice the average win (142 pips), the strategy is intended to lose funds. To understand why the 30% winning probability is unrealistic for the system to at least break even, one would require more than 55% winning probability.
2. Gold (XAU/USD) is the Single Biggest Predictor of Loss
Despite all instruments being in the red, the Gold instrument contributed far more to the collective drawdown. It was responsible for 82% of the year’s losses in its entirety (9,599 out of 11,752). This suggests a dramatic failure in the strategy pertaining to the channel’s approach for the volatile market in the respective commodities.
3. Illusion of ‘Good Months’ Hides the Ongoing Bleed
Even in the “best” performing month (February 2025), the channel lost 119 pips. There was no single month in the whole year that was profitable. This proves that the issue of poor performance is not because of some losses in certain trades but is an inherent characteristic of the system because it doesn’t have any profitable periods for the subscribers.
4. Extreme Risk Concentration from Low Signal Frequency
There are very few trading signals on the channel (just 1-2 per week). This means that each trade is of monumental importance. Even the four weakest trades individually led to losses totaling over -1,864 pips. Since the opportunities are few, one’s whole month or year may end up being lost simply on the back of one trade in the Gold market.
The Bottom Line
School Of Trades - A Lesson in Consistent Losses
“School Of Trades” is the name of the Telegram channel that promotes free trading signals. However, the in-depth analysis of the one-year performance of the channel indicates that the strategy is fundamentally flawed.
Over the course of the 12 months, the channel’s record has been consistent: catastrophic losses. Currently, the accumulated losses stand at over -11,700 pips in the past year. Once again, the problem lies in the flawed strategy the channel employs. Its winning percentage stands at no better than 30%, with its risk-to-reward levels skewed in such a way that the average loss far surpasses the average gain.
However, the most alarming one is the trading of the Gold pair (XAU/USD), which contributed more than 80% to the annual losses by itself. This clearly shows that the volatility of the said asset was not being managed effectively.
Our Rating: Bad
Verdict: Avoid at All Costs. Four years on from its launch, "School Of Trades" fails to teach people profitable trading. Instead, it teaches how to spend capital. Unsuspecting subscribers could do no better than ignore all of the signals.
