Sphyn | Master Trade Telegram Channel Review. Verified Trading Statistics & Results in 2024-2025

Free Signals Channel Review

• Channel Name: Sphyn | Master Trade

• Full Years of Operation: 2

• Number of Subscribers: 12185

• Trading Style: day trading, swing trading Trading Sessions: London and Asia

Sphyn | Master Trade

@sphyntrading

Back Testing Results: BAD

Free Signals: 130 

Win Rate: 32%

Period: 21.01.2025 - 21.01.2026

Pips of Profit: -637

Free Signals Analysis & Reviews

• Average Profit per Signal: 130 pips

• Markets: Gold

• Average Holding Time: 8 hours

• Average Profit a Week: -12 pips

• Number of Signals a Day: 2-3 a week

Signals Statistics

Month (2025)	Win Rate	Signals	Avg Profit	Monthly P/L
January	35%	10	-2.5	-25
February	30%	9	-8.2	-74
March	33%	11	-3.8	-42
April	31%	10	-6.1	-61
May	34%	11	-4.3	-47
June	29%	9	-9.5	-86
July	32%	12	-5.2	-62
August	30%	10	-7.8	-78
September	33%	11	-3.9	-43
October	31%	10	-6.5	-65
November	35%	13	-2.1	-27
December	29%	9	-10.2	-92
January 2026	32%	5	-4.4	-22

Best Free Signals

XAU/USD	XAU/USD	XAU/USD	XAU/USD
156	142	135	128

Worst Free Signals

XAU/USD	XAU/USD	XAU/USD	XAU/USD
-89	-82	-78	-75

Key Statistics Insights:

1. The Inevitable Losing Streak math

Given a 32% win rate, a string of 10 consecutive losses isn't as unusual as you might think:

• Probability: (0.68)^10 ≈

• Expected frequency: once every 476 signals

• With approximately 130 signals being fired every year, the 10-loss streak is expected every 3 to 4 years. Indeed, this matches the points in the spreadsheet where there’s an increase in spotted losses per month, with -86 pips in June and -92 in December.

2. “The ‘130 Profit’ is a statistical mirage”

   
   

• The banner “Average Profit per Signal: 130” gives a misleading impression of profitabilitybecause:

• True Expected Return per Signal: approximately -$6.00

• Depletion time for $1,000 account: 167 signals, or about 15 months

• Psychological trap: One individual 156 pip win is fantastic, but with only a 32% win rate, it seems like for every win, two losses in the -75 to -89 range have to be absorbed.

3. Gold's Volatility Hides a Poor Strategy

• The 8-hour average for Gold (XAU/USD) is alarming:

• Average Daily Range of Gold: ~150 pips

• Target for Channel: ~140 pips

• Problem: To catch more than 90% of the range using day trading means making near-perfect entry points, which is verified by the 32% win rate that is definitely not the case. This strategy effectively plays on trend days, experiencing mean reversion throughout.

4. The subscription retention paradox

• Despite this, the channel retains 12,185 subscribers:

• Range for monthly loses: between -22 to -92 pips

• The "best month" illusion: November sees -27 pips, close to breakeven and surely brings in renewals.

• Survivorship bias: those who trade in smaller quantities or don't care about losses will still be subscribed, giving false signals about engagement. The "12,185" likely contains many inactive accounts.

The Bottom Line

This signals channel dedicated to Gold, which has been running for 2 years with a subscribers base in excess of 12,000, is a typical case where statistics have concealed continuous losses.

At first sight, this trading channel prides in having a reward-to-risk ratio of 1.85 and averaging 130 pip profitable trades. The problem comes in at a 32% winning rate, which is what brings down this entire system. This system's negative expectancy comes in at -$6.00 per trade and means a $15 per week loss for followers.

The screenshot of the “best signals” with a 156 pip profit is psychologically enticing, but statistically insignificant. For each of these profitable trades, there are a string of –75 to –89 pip losses, which cumulatively drain the accounts of the subscribers. This is reflected in the annual performance of the channel, which stands at –637 pips, with no profitable month throughout the audit period of a year.

The Gold pair traded with the average 8-hour hold while targeting close to the entire daily range. The precision in this chart is clearly absent. The strategy is seemingly relying on runaway trends while incurring numerous stop outs.

Our Rating: Bad

Final Recommendation: Avoid. This is a trading channel that survives through the selective marketing of winning trade results and the hope bias of the viewers. In trading, it is better to be consistent rather than rely on home runs, and a 32 percent win rate is a guarantee of a trading loss, no matter how large the home run.