69 FX Telegram Channel Review. Verified Trading Statistics & Results in 2025-2026

Free Signals Channel Review

• Channel Name: 69 FX

• Full Years of Operation: 2

• Number of Subscribers: 53962

• Trading Style: day trading Trading Sessions: New York, London

Free Signals Analysis & Reviews

• Average Profit per Signal: 75 pips

• Markets: Gold

• Average Holding Time: 8 hours

• Average Profit a Week: -76 pips

• Number of Signals: 0-2 a day

Signals Statistics

Best Free Signals

Worst Free Signals

Key Statistics Insights:

1. High Consistency in Loss Size vs. Profit Volatility
   

The average loss per trade, which was 70 pips, had a high level of consistency from month to month, ranging between approximately 68 and 74 pips. Conversely, winning trades had a wider range of 72 to 80 pips. This indicates that the channel’s risk management strategy may have a rigid limit to loss, while the profit-taking strategy may not have a high level of consistency. However, the low win percentage of this system makes it a losing system.

2. Negative Net P&L Despite Favorable Risk/Reward Ratio

   
   

The reward/risk ratio of this system, which is 1.07, is favorable and indicates that the system can make money with a win percentage that is higher than 48%. However, the system’s actual win percentage of 34% is much lower than the required percentage to make this system profitable. Insight: A reward/risk ratio that is higher than 1.0 does not guarantee a profitable system. A high reward/risk ratio and a low win percentage guarantee a losing system.

3. Worst Losing Months Occurred During Low-Volatility Periods

   
   

The months that had the highest loss, such as August 2025, which had a loss of –798 pips, had a high average loss of 74 pips and a low win percentage of 29%. This may have been due to the gold price being range-bound, where day trading breakouts are not profitable. However, the system did not reduce the signal generation in these months. This may have been a behavioral bias of the system.

4. “Best Signals” Were Only ~2.6× Average Win; “Worst Signals” Were ~1.6× Average Loss

   
   

The highest winning signal had a profit of +198 pips, or approximately 2.6 times the average winning profit of 75 pips. Conversely, the worst losing signal had a loss of –114 pips, or approximately 1.63 times the average loss of 70 pips. This indicates that the system had a better handle on the loss than the winning signal. However, the low percentage of winning trades resulted in a losing system.

The Bottom Line

69 FX is a free Telegram signal service that sends day trading signals for the asset class Gold (XAU/USD) and has been operational for over 2 years with a large following of over 53k subscribers.

Performance Analysis:

The performance of this signal service indicates that it is a structurally unprofitable service. This is because, despite having a large following and being operational for a long time, the signal service’s performance statistics indicate that it is not profitable. This is due to the low win percentage of 34%, and the reward to risk ratio of 1.07. This indicates that the service’s performance will always be unprofitable. This is because the reward to risk ratio of 1.07 indicates that the service’s performance will always result in a loss. This was also evident in our simulation of the service’s performance over a 12-month period, which resulted in a loss of over 4,100 pips. This translates to an average loss of -79 pips each week.

Strengths:

The signal service has a few strengths that are evident from the analysis of the service’s performance. These strengths are as follows:

Clear Discipline: The signal service’s use of a tightly managed stop loss, which averaged a loss of 70 pips, indicates that the service hasCritical Weaknesses:

• Low Win Rate Overwhelms Positive R:R: While a R:R greater than 1:1 is beneficial, a win rate of only one-third means that even a high R:R is ineffective.

• Lack of Adaptability: The signal rate did not change during losing months, causing greater drawdowns.

• Negative Expectancy: The expected value of each signal is approximately -8 pips based on given averages—a slow but certain way to lose money. Who Might Still Use It?

  
  

This signal service might be used by a seasoned trader as a means of generating trade ideas, but they should be able to handle their own risk. For a retail trader blindly following a signal service, they can be statistically assured to lose money following these signals.

Our Rating: Bad

Final Verdict: 69 FX represents a common problem with signal services: a solid trade structure but no way to make money. While free, a hidden fee is required in the form of lost money. Better to utilize these signals as a means of learning why so many of them fail rather than a means of making money in a live account.