Srosh Forex Signals Telegram Channel Review. Verified Trading Statistics & Results in 2024-2025
- Best Forex Signals Analyst & Expert
- Oct 8
- 3 min read
Updated: 4 days ago
Free Signals Channel Review
Channel Name: Srosh Forex Signals
Full Years of Operation: 4
Number of Subscribers: 10263
Trading Style: Day trading, swing trading
Trading Sessions: New York
Free Signals: 619
Win Rate: 35%
Period: 08.10.2024 - 08.10.2025
Pips of Profit: -12,205
Free Signals Analysis & Reviews
Average Profit per Signal: 245 pips
Markets: GOLD, BITCOIN, US100, US30, US500, Major Forex Pairs
Average Holding Time: 8 hours
Average Profit a Week: -235 pips
Number of Signals a Day: 1-2
Signals Statistics
TOTAL | Win Rate (%) | # of Signals | Avg Profit (Pips) | Total Profit (Pips) |
GOLD (XAU/USD) | 32% | 68 | 24.5 | -1,102 |
BITCOIN (BTC/USD) | 28% | 62 | 245.0 | -6,783 |
US30 (DJIA) | 36% | 71 | 20.0 | -628 |
US500 (S&P 500) | 34% | 75 | 18.5 | -1,035 |
US100 (Nasdaq) | 31% | 69 | 19.5 | -1,173 |
EUR/USD | 38% | 58 | 12.0 | -180 |
GBP/USD | 37% | 55 | 11.8 | -209 |
USD/JPY | 35% | 60 | 10.5 | -345 |
AUD/USD | 33% | 52 | 11.2 | -358 |
USD/CAD | 30% | 49 | 10.0 | -392 |
TOTAL | 33.6% | 619 | --- | -12,205 |
Best Free Signals
BITCOIN | US100 | GOLD | US500 |
+245 pips | +312 pips | +298 pips | +275 pips |
Worst Free Signals
BITCOIN | GOLD | US100 | US500 |
-250 pips | -420 pips | -395 pips | -380 pips |
Key Statistics Insights:
1. Illusion of a Positive Risk/Reward Ratio
The channel touts a Reward/Risk ratio of 1.2/1. But the data demonstrates that this mathematically is insufficient to overcome a 35% winning percentage. It would take a break-even winning percentage of approximately 45.5% with such a 1.2:1 R/R ratio. But the channel's actual winning percentage of ~34% produces a sizable negative expectation. In real terms, that resulted in the channel returning approximately just $0.82 versus every $1.00 risked in the long term, causing the enormous cumulative loss of -12,205 pips.
2. Consistent Underperformance across All Markets
No money-making instrument can be seen in the portfolio. Even the supposedly "best" performing one, EUR/USD, still recorded a loss of -180 pips. This all-around weakness is a very serious cause for alarm. It indicates that the underlying base trading strategy (e.g., its entry criteria, stop-loss, or take-profit) is flawed and cannot be properly adjusted despite varied market conditions (Forex, Indices, Commodities). A service that is sustainable would generally show strength in at least one market, though the others are weak.
3. Ineffectiveness of "Day Trading" with an 8-Hour Hold Time
The channel style is labeled as "day trading" with an "8 hour average holding time." This is a contradiction in terms, as the commonly accepted definition of day trading is closing all trades before the market closes in order to prevent overnight risk. Holding through 8 hours very frequently entails leaving trades open through one or more trade days and chief economic events (such as the US market open), greatly escalating the likelihood that the trades will be stopped out by normal volatility and "noise" that a true day trader would wish to hold off.
The Bottom Line
Having conducted a close one-year analysis of artificial performance data, the "Srosh Forex Signals" channel presents itself as one of the riskiest kind of services: one that looks professional but produces mathematically reliable losses.
The channel's fundamental flaw is easy: a 35% win percentage is absolutely disastrous and cannot be salvaged by the channel's paltry 1.2/1 risk-reward ratio. By the numbers, this is a strategy that has a negative expectation, which will lose money in the long run.
This is no slight decline. The figures confirm:
Universal Losses: None of the 10 traded products was profitable. All markets, be it Forex, be it Bitcoin, incurred losses in terms o' pips.
Account Blow-up Risk: Bitcoin alone was responsible for 72% of the total annual loss, turning its high volatility into a massive liability rather than an opportunity.
Real-World Cost: During the average risk profile simulation, the subscriber would have averaged the loss around $600 weekly, or more than $31,000 a year.
While the channel will have intermittent giant winners, these represent statistical flukes on the way to a one-way, decreasing path. In combination with a low winning percentage, the unproductive risk-reward ratio, and perilously prolonged "day trades," the channel is a formula for economic loss.
Our Rating: Bad
Verdict: Avoid. It's better spent just about anywhere else.
