Trading Puzzles Telegram Channel Review. Verified Trading Statistics & Results in 2024-2025
- Best Forex Signals Analyst & Expert
- Sep 13
- 3 min read
Updated: 4 days ago
Free Signals Channel Review
Channel Name: Trading Puzzles
Full Years of Operation: 4
Number of Subscribers: 13249
Trading Style: Day Trading, Swing Trading, Scalping
Trading Sessions: London
Free Signals: 783
Win Rate: 31%
Period: 13.09.2024 - 13.09.2025
Pips of Profit: -3,879
Free Signals Analysis & Reviews
Average Profit per Signal: 65 pips
Markets: Major and minor forex pairs, gold, silver, bitcoin, major altcoins, us major indexes
Average Holding Time: 8 hours
Average Profit a Week: -75 pips
Number of Signals a Day: 3
Signals Statistics
Instrument | Win Rate % | # of Signals | Avg. Profit (Pips) | Total Profit (Pips) |
EUR/USD | 32.4% | 108 | -6.2 | -670 |
GBP/USD | 28.6% | 91 | -8.5 | -774 |
USD/JPY | 35.2% | 88 | -4.1 | -361 |
AUD/USD | 25.0% | 76 | -11.3 | -859 |
XAU/USD (Gold) | 29.4% | 68 | -12.5 | -850 |
XAG/USD (Silver) | 10.8% | 65 | -18.9 | -1,229 |
BTC/USD | 38.5% | 52 | -21.4 | -1,113 |
ETH/USD | 33.3% | 48 | -19.8 | -950 |
USD/CAD | 31.3% | 48 | -7.5 | -360 |
USD/CHF | 27.8% | 36 | -9.2 | -331 |
GBP/JPY | 30.0% | 30 | -11.6 | -348 |
SPX500 (S&P 500) | 35.7% | 28 | -15.1 | -423 |
US30 (Dow Jones) | 25.0% | 24 | -16.8 | -403 |
NAS100 (Nasdaq) | 40.0% | 20 | -12.5 | -250 |
TOTAL | 30.9% | 783 | -5.0 | -3,879 |
Best Free Signals
NAS100 (Nasdaq) | USD/JPY | EUR/USD | BTC/USD |
+126 pips | +98 pips | +91 pips | +245 pips |
Worst Free Signals
XAG/USD (Silver) | AUD/USD | XAU/USD (Gold) | GBP/USD |
-189 pips | -152 pips | -148 pips | -135 pips |
Key Statistics Insights:
1. Catastrophic Commodities Performance, Especially Silver
The data reveal commodity trading was a huge losing strategy. Silver (XAG/USD) was the worst-performing vehicle by far, with only a 10.8% winning record and an average loss of nearly -19 pips per trade. A single silver trade was the worst ever at -189 pips. This means the channel's strategy is not particularly adapted to the particular volatility of the silver market, and is therefore a huge contributor to the overall net loss.
2. The "Low Win Rate Trap" is Verified
The channel's ~31% aggregate win rate and 1.4 Reward/Risk ratio equate to a mathematically negative expectancy. It is a classic case of the "low win rate trap" where the returns of successful trades are not sufficiently high to compensate for the large number of small losses. The figures attest to this: despite a few very large winning trades (e.g., +245 pips on BTC), the sheer number of losing causes a significant net overall loss of -3,879 pips for the year.
3. Tech Exceeds Conventional Assets
A great highlight was the performance of technology-oriented instruments. NAS100 (Nasdaq) had the highest win ratio at 40%, and its largest winning trade was a significant +126 pips. This superiority to regular forex pairs and commodities suggests the analysis of the channel can be more effective when applied to growth-oriented indices, or that its approach coincidentally is more in tune with tech industry momentum.
4. High Volatility is a Double-Edged Sword
The most profitable instruments were also the riskiest ones. Bitcoin (BTC) and Silver (XAG/USD) carry the biggest absolute pip movements (positive and negative). However, in this channel, the outcome was strongly negative. This implies that even though the channel is targeting risky instruments in order to achieve its profit objectives, it never manages to hold the connected risk, thereby providing the largest single losses.
The Bottom Line
In four years of existence, Trading Puzzles continually generates negative results. Its approach of attempting to win with little wins is not up to its risk profile and is very likely to lose money in the long term. Subscribers are literally paying to be instructed on how to lose at the markets.
Key Findings:
Mathematically Doomed Approach: The flaw is inherent in its premise. A 31% success ratio indicates that with an extremely high reward-to-risk ratio (substantially above 3:1) it would be profitable. The 1.4:1 of this channel prevents any long-term profitability, corroborated by the result of a simulated annual loss of about -3,900 pips.
Gargantuan Volatility & Unreliability: The focus of the channel on high-volatility products like silver, bitcoin, and gold comes back to haunt it in full fury. While once in a while a trade gets a huge profit (e.g., +245 pips on BTC), losses are far more frequent and in much higher multiples. Trades in silver (XAG/USD) were disastrous, with a 10.8% winning rate and a single-trade loss record of -189 pips.
Misleading Presentation: A channel that maintains below 50% win rate and negative pip result must be honest about its high-risk, high-loss nature. Portraying this as a "free signal" service without such a disclaimer is irresponsible and can be costly to inexperienced traders.
Our Rating: Bad
Conclusion: Trading Puzzles is not a puzzle to be solved. The record shows a clear and consistent pattern of losses. Traders would do better to keep their capital and learn, rather than take advice from a channel with proven negative expectancy.
