ULTREOS FOREX Telegram Channel Review. Verified Trading Statistics & Results in 2024-2025
- Best Forex Signals Analyst & Expert
- Oct 25
- 4 min read
Updated: 4 days ago
Free Signals Channel Review
Channel Name: ULTREOS FOREX
Full Years of Operation: 6
Number of Subscribers: 37969
Trading Style: day trading, swing trading
Trading Sessions: London
Free Signals: 418
Win Rate: 31%
Period: 24.10.2024 - 24.10.2025
Pips of Profit: -6,227
Free Signals Analysis & Reviews
Average Profit per Signal: 186 pips
Markets: Forex Major Pairs, Minor Pairs, US30, US100, GOLD XAUUSD
Average Holding Time: 8 hours
Average Profit a Week: -122 pips
Number of Signals a Day: 1-2
Signals Statistics
Trading Instrument | Win Rate (%) | # of Signals | Avg Profit (Pips) | Total Profit (Pips) |
EUR/USD | 32% | 47 | 24 | -238 |
GBP/USD | 29% | 51 | 25 | -552 |
USD/JPY | 33% | 46 | 23 | -156 |
AUD/USD | 30% | 40 | 26 | -284 |
USD/CAD | 28% | 39 | 24 | -372 |
NZD/USD | 31% | 32 | 25 | -160 |
EUR/GBP | 35% | 28 | 18 | -18 |
US30 | 27% | 44 | 110 | -2,002 |
US100 | 30% | 42 | 95 | -1,050 |
GOLD (XAUUSD) | 33% | 49 | 190 | -1,235 |
TOTAL/AVERAGE | 31% | 418 | - | -6,227 |
Best Free Signals
US100 | GOLD (XAUUSD) | EUR/USD | US30 |
285 pips | 450 pips | 78 pips | 275 pips |
Worst Free Signals
GBP/USD | US30 | GOLD (XAUUSD) | US100 |
-57 pips | -180 pips | -120 pips | -95 pips |
Key Statistics Insights:
1. The Strategy is Mathematically Doomed Despite a Positive Risk/Reward.
This is the most critical insight. The channel has a positive Risk/Reward ratio of 1.3, meaning winning trades are, on average, 30% larger than losing trades. However, with a win rate of only 31%, the expected return per trade is negative.
Calculation: (Win Rate % * Avg Win) - (Loss Rate % * Avg Loss)
= (0.31 x 25 pips) – (0.69 x 19 p
= 7.75 - 13.11 = -5.36 pips expected loss per trade.
The negative expectancy is what translates into a net loss in the long run for the channel. The 44% win rate would be required in order to breakeven with 1.3 R:R ratio.
2. Indices (US30, US100) Were the Biggest Destroyers of Wealth
All securities were net losers, but the indices were the cause for the net loss.
Only US30 and US100 contributed –3,052 pips for the total loss of –6,227 pips.
Thus, only two instruments were involved in trading in nearly 50% of the total loss, accounting for 21% of trades in total. Clearly, the strategy for trading volatile stock indices is presently weak in the channel.
3. The 'Best' Trades Cannot Compensate for the Loss Frequency.
The four single best signals were highly profitable (for example, GOLD +450 pips, US100 +285 pips). However, such profitable outcomes did happen only occasionally.
The combined profit from these four trades came to around +1,088 pips.
The total loss from only the four worst trades is 452 pips.
This illustrates the core issue: the few large wins are quickly eroded by the constant stream of smaller, more frequent losses. The channel's strategy suffers from long, consistent drawdowns punctuated by rare, sharp recoveries.
4. Consistency of Losses Across All Instruments Suggests a Flawed Core Strategy.
The poor performance did not happen on one or two instruments; rather, it occurred on a universal basis for all 10 markets that were followed. Each individual instrument in the report ended up with a net loss in pips for the year. The "best" performer (EUR/GBP) remained a loser, albeit the "least bad." This is a strong indication that the issue is not with bad luck in the specific instruments, but rather that there is something inherently wrong with the trading strategy implemented in the channel with regards to adapting to different market circumstances and instruments.
The Bottom Line
The ULTREOS FOREX trading channel claims to be a professional trading service with six years of trading experience; however, an examination of its trading performance over one year makes it overwhelmingly likely to swindle your money.
The big advantage for the channel is its positive Risk/Reward ratio with an value of 1.3, indicating that the profit level is higher compared to the loss level for winning trades in particular. But unfortunately, such an advantage has been made useless thanks to its stupendously poor Win Rate at only 31% in particular, which makes it directly responsible for its net loss over 6,200 pips in the last year itself!
Key Reasons to Avoid:
Average Weekly Losses: We would have been losing an average of 122 pips on a weekly basis.
Universal Underperformance: none of the ten trading instruments (Forex pairs, Gold, and indices) showed any profit. That’s a problem with the underlying strategy, not just luck.
Wealth Destruction in Indices: Specifically, it performed badly in US30 and US100 trading, which together accounted for almost half of the wealth destruction.
Our Rating: Bad
Conclusion: While the promise of "free signals" is enticing, the cost of following ULTREOS FOREX is a near-guaranteed depletion of your trading capital. The long-term data proves that its strategy is fundamentally flawed. Traders are better off looking for a service with a proven, statistically positive track record, or focusing on their own education instead of following signals that systematically lose money.
