top of page

XAUUSD Scalper Telegram Channel Review. Verified Trading Statistics & Results in 2025-2026

  • Writer: Best Forex Signals Analyst & Expert
    Best Forex Signals Analyst & Expert
  • 5 days ago
  • 3 min read

XAUUSD Scalper reviews results trading statistics telegram group

Telegram Channel Overview


  • Channel Name: XAUUSD Scalper

  • Full Years of Operation: 3

  • Number of Subscribers: 6641

  • Trading Style: scalping, day trading Trading Sessions: London Sessions

XAUUSD Scalper telegram channel  reviews backtesting results statistics of vip free signals channel on telegram

XAUUSD Scalper

@gold_xauusd_scalper


Back Testing Results: BAD

Free Signals: 348


Win Rate: 35%

Period: 28.04.2025 - 28.04.2026


Pips of Profit: -10,788


Free Signals Backtesting & Reviews


  • Average Profit per Signal: 60 pips

  • Markets: Gold

  • Average Holding Time: 8 hours

  • Average Profit a Week: −207 pips

  • Number of Signals: 1-2 a day


Signals Statistics

Trading Instrument

Win Rate (%)

Signals (month)

Avg Profit (pips)

Total Profit (pips)

XAUUSD

35

24

60

-744

XAUUSD

35

31

60

-961

XAUUSD

35

19

60

-589

XAUUSD

35

38

60

-1178

XAUUSD

35

26

60

-806

XAUUSD

35

33

60

-1023

XAUUSD

35

22

60

-682

XAUUSD

35

29

60

-899

XAUUSD

35

35

60

-1085

XAUUSD

35

27

60

-837

XAUUSD

35

41

60

-1271

XAUUSD

35

23

60

-713


Best Free Signal

XAUUSD

GBPUSD

SILVER

NAS100

+60 pips

+60 pips

+59 pips

+58 pips

Worst Free Signals

XAUUSD

GBPUSD

SILVER

NAS100

−80 pips

−82 pips

−85 pips

−90 pips

Key Statistics Insights:


1. Even the profit of the four best signals is not enough to compensate for the loss of the four worst signals


The total profit achieved due to the top 4 signals is about +240 pips.

The total loss incurred due to the worst 4 signals is over −330 pips.


Thus, even in case we choose only 8 signals, we will still remain in loss. The worst signals bring damage which cannot be overcome with the help of the best ones.


2. You would need to make several months' worth of consecutive profits without any losses to break even


The loss for the entire year is close to −11,000 pips.


Assuming that each profitable deal brought you the max possible amount of profit (+60 pips), to achieve zero you would have to have at least 180 wins in a row with no single loss.

However, taking into account losses, this number is much higher – it cannot be reached anyway.


3. All deals are losing deals statistically speaking, regardless of their sequence


Having 35% of wins and 65% of losses, each trade on average loses 31 pips.

It doesn't matter how the wins are sequenced and where they come from. After 100 trades, a trader will incur losses of about 3,100 pips. If there will be 300 trades, he will have −9,300 pips losses on average. Thus, stats are working against traders since the first deal.


4. You would need to have more winning trades than you currently have to break even, while the channel is making profit from only one out of three trades


To break even considering 60/80 pip deals, it's necessary to make about 58% of winning deals.

However, the reality is 35% of wins, which means a difference of 23 percentage points.

Increasing this value twice will still not make you earn anything.


The Bottom Line


After analyzing the data on trading from XAUUSD Scalper during one year, the conclusion can be easily drawn – this channel is a sure way to drain your funds.


With three years of experience, over 6,600 subscribers, a win rate of just 35%, and an average loss of 80 pips, which is twice bigger than average wins (60 pips), each trade will have a negative expected value for you. For a whole year and 348 signals, you will lose 10,700 pips.


The channel presents itself as a scalping and day trading service specializing in gold and London session. Yet, holding positions for an average of 8 hours doesn't fit the criteria of scalping, while reward to risk of 0.75 implies that the trader risks losing more than he or she can earn.


Four top trades in the year couldn't make up for four bad losses, while, statistically, the trader needs to win at least 58% of his or her trades to be able to breakeven with such a risk level. But the channel provides a win rate of just 35%.



Our Rating: Bad



Verdict: This channel cannot be considered as a trading signals provider. This is a rather sluggish and very predictable way to lose money. Every week a subscriber will lose 207 pips on average.

bottom of page