Forex ICT Concept & Mentorship Telegram Channel Review. Verified Trading Statistics & Results in 2025-2026
- Best Forex Signals Analyst & Expert
- 19 hours ago
- 3 min read
Free Signals Channel Review
Channel Name: Forex ICT Concept & Mentorship
Full Years of Operation: 3
Number of Subscribers: 38686
Trading Style: day trading, swing trading Trading Sessions: New York
Free Signals: 432
Win Rate: 28%
Period: 03.04.2025 - 03.04.2026
Pips of Profit: –9,438
Free Signals Analysis & Reviews
Average Profit per Signal: 160 pips
Markets: Forex majors and Gold
Average Holding Time: 8 hours
Average Profit a Week: -182 pips
Number of Signals: 2 a day
Signals Statistics
Trading Instrument | Win Rate (%) | Number of Signals | Avg Profit per Signal (pips) | Total Profit (pips) |
EUR/USD | 27% | 68 | –18.4 | –1,251 |
GBP/USD | 30% | 62 | –10.8 | –670 |
USD/JPY | 25% | 70 | –22.5 | –1,575 |
AUD/USD | 29% | 55 | –12.6 | –693 |
USD/CAD | 26% | 60 | –21.0 | –1,260 |
NZD/USD | 24% | 45 | –27.2 | –1,224 |
XAU/USD (Gold) | 22% | 72 | –38.4 | –2,765 |
Best Free Signals
EUR/USD | GBP/USD | XAU/USD (Gold) | USD/JPY |
+158 pips | +162 pips | +155 pips | +160 pips |
Worst Free Signals
EUR/USD | GBP/USD | XAU/USD (Gold) | USD/CAD |
–158 pips | –172 pips | –245 pips | –143 pips |
Key Statistics Insights:
1. The channel needs a 43.5% win rate just to break even — but it only has 28%
With a Reward/Risk ratio of 1.3 (winning +160 pips / losing –120 pips), the breakeven win rate is calculated as:
1 ÷ (1 + R/R) = 1 ÷ 2.3 = 43.5%
At 28% win rate, the expected net loss per trade is:
(0.28 × 160) – (0.72 × 120) = 44.8 – 86.4 = –41.6 pips per trade
Over 432 signals, that theoretical loss would be –17,971 pips — but the actual simulated loss was only –9,438 pips, meaning the channel got lucky relative to expectation, yet still lost heavily.
2. Gold (XAU/USD) produced nearly 30% of all losses despite being only 1 of 7 instruments
Instrument | Share of total signals | Share of total pips lost |
XAU/USD | 16.7% (72 of 432) | 29.3% (–2,765 of –9,438) |
Gold's –245 pip worst single loss was more than double the typical –120 pip loss, showing that high-volatility assets magnify losses when win rates are low.
3. By reacting to every signal, the trader would lose ~181 pips each week, which is analogous to losing 1-2 trading days on a weekly basis.
Average loss per week: –181.5 pips
Averaging 8.3 signals per week, the average loss per signal amounts to –21.9 pips.
Practically speaking, the loss amounts to $75 per week or ~$3,900 per year for a $5,000 trading account where 1% is staked on each trade, which implies –120 pips risk per trade.
4. The best winning trade, with +162 pips gained on GBP/USD, was not much higher than the worst trade, at –158 pips on EUR/USD. However, the worst trade on gold at –245 pips negated 1.5 winning trades.
Best gain: +162 pips on GBP/USD
Worst loss on one of the major currencies: –158 pips on EUR/USD
Ratio: almost 1:1
Worst loss on Gold: –245 pips
It means that 1.53 winning trades were required in order to negate this one loss.
The Bottom Line
Verdict: Not recommended — mathematically designed to lose
At first glance, this channel appears legitimate: 3 years of operation, 38,000+ subscribers, trading New York session with ICT concepts. However, the numbers tell a very different story.
The Problem
Having a 28% winning rate with a reward/risk ratio of 1.3 is mathematically losing. At this level, the channel needs to have at least a 43.5% win rate just to break even. Each and every trade conducted according to this advice produces an estimated loss of –42 pips.
In one year, a trader who uses such a channel to trade can expect to lose about 10,000 pips on Forex majors and Gold. These losses are not a matter of bad luck but are a result of an objectively unprofitable strategy.
The Gold Trap
XAU/USD is a currency pair that should be avoided in this case because, although accounting for only 17% of all trades, it resulted in 30% of overall pips lost. In addition, the largest single-trade loss of –245 pips was recorded on this pair.
Who Is This Channel For?
No one. Although this channel claims to share knowledge related to "ICT Concepts," its actual performance suggests otherwise. Any other trader with a minimum set of skills will easily make a profit by using a flip-a-coin approach with the correct risk management technique.
Our Rating: Bad
Avoid. This channel will definitely lead you to financial ruin. Don't take this advice as free trading signals. Instead, it represents the clever marketing of an unprofitable trading strategy to attract more subscribers.
