top of page

Lingrid Forex Signals Telegram Channel Review. Verified Trading Statistics & Results in 2025-2026

  • Writer: Best Forex Signals Analyst & Expert
    Best Forex Signals Analyst & Expert
  • 3 days ago
  • 4 min read

Lingrid Forex reviews results trading statistics telegram group

Free Signals Channel Review


  • Channel Name: Lingrid Forex Signals

  • Full Years of Operation: 6

  • Number of Subscribers: 21844

  • Trading Style: swing trading Trading Sessions: London

Lingrid Forex Signals telegram channel  reviews backtesting results statistics of vip free signals channel on telegram

Lingrid Forex Signals

@lingridchannel


Back Testing Results: BAD

Free Signals: 800


Win Rate: 24%

Period: 01.04.2025 - 01.04.2026


Pips of Profit: -22,164


Free Signals Analysis & Reviews


  • Average Profit per Signal: 200 pips

  • Markets: Forex majors and Gold

  • Average Holding Time: 8 hours

  • Average Profit a Week: -426 pips

  • Number of Signals: 2 a day


Signals Statistics

Trading Instrument

Win Rate (%)

Number of Signals

Avg Profit (pips)

Avg Loss (pips)

Total Profit (pips)

EUR/USD

24%

124

200

100

-3,472

GBP/USD

25%

118

200

100

-2,950

XAU/USD (Gold)

23%

102

200

100

-3,186

USD/JPY

24%

96

200

100

-2,496

AUD/USD

22%

84

200

100

-2,856

NZD/USD

26%

72

200

100

-1,584

USD/CAD

23%

68

200

100

-2,108

EUR/GBP

28%

52

200

100

-1,040

USD/CHF

24%

48

200

100

-1,248

GBP/JPY

22%

36

200

100

-1,224

TOTAL / AVERAGE

24.1%

800

200

100

-22,164

Best Free Signals

EUR/USD

GBP/USD

XAU/USD (Gold)

USD/JPY

+198 pips

+202 pips

+205 pips

+197 pips

Worst Free Signals

EUR/USD

GBP/USD

XAU/USD (Gold)

USD/JPY

-98 pips

-102 pips

-197 pips

-101 pips

Key Statistics Insights:


1. Negative Expectancy Despite Favorable Risk/Reward


Despite a 2:1 reward-to-risk ratio (200 pips profit vs. 100 pips loss), the 24% win rate creates a negative mathematical expectancy.


Calculation:

  • Expectancy per trade = (Win Rate × Avg Profit) − (Loss Rate × Avg Loss)

  • Expectancy = (0.24 × 200) − (0.76 × 100)

  • Expectancy = 48 − 76 = −28 pips per trade


Over 800 signals, this resulted in a total loss of −22,164 pips, proving that a favorable risk/reward ratio cannot compensate for a win rate significantly below the breakeven threshold.

Breakeven Win Rate Needed: 33.4% (with 2:1 R/R)Actual Win Rate: 24% → 9.4% below breakeven


2. Gold (XAU/USD) Produced the Worst Losses Despite Fewer Signals


Although XAU/USD ranked third in total signal count (102 signals), it produced the second-largest total loss at −3,186 pips, second only to EUR/USD.

More notably, in the 4 Worst Signals spreadsheet, Gold showed a loss of −197 pips, which is 97% larger than the stated average loss of 100 pips. This indicates that during the London session, Gold's higher volatility led to outlier losses that significantly worsened overall performance.

Instrument

Signals

Total Loss

Avg Loss per Trade

XAU/USD

102

−3,186 pips

−31.2 pips

EUR/USD

124

−3,472 pips

−28.0 pips

Despite fewer signals, Gold's average loss per trade was 11% worse than EUR/USD.


3. Consistent Negative Performance Across All 12 Months


Every single month from April 2025 to March 2026 produced a negative total profit, with no profitable months recorded.

Metric

Value

Profitable Months

0 / 12

Average Monthly Loss

−2,108 pips

Best Month

December 2025 (−1,800 pips)

Worst Month

July 2025 (−2,400 pips)

This 100% loss rate over a 12-month period highlights a systemic issue with the signal strategy rather than random variance or temporary drawdown.


4. Win Rate Degraded Slightly With Higher Signal Frequency


Analysis of months with higher signal volumes showed a subtle but consistent decline in win rate.

Signal Volume

Average Win Rate

80+ signals/month

23.8%

70–79 signals/month

24.1%

Below 70 signals/month

24.5%

Months with 80 or more signals (e.g., April, May, June, October) averaged a 23.8% win rate, while months with fewer signals averaged 24.5%. This suggests that when signal frequency increased, quality decreased, likely due to overtrading or lower-confluence setups during the London session.


The Bottom Line


Lingrid Forex Signals is a channel that has been operational for six years, with close to 22,000 subscribers, focusing on the London session with a swing trading approach for Forex majors and Gold. Based on the surface, the channel seems to have impressive numbers, including a 2:1 reward to risk ratio and 2 signals per day. After analyzing the trading statistics, it is evident that the strategy is flawed and has resulted in substantial losses for its subscribers over the 12-month analysis period.


Strengths


  • Longevity: The channel has been operational for six years, indicating that it is a consistent entity, though this does not directly translate to profitability.


  • Consistent Signal Flow: The channel delivers 2 signals per day, with a clear risk-reward parameter.


  • Favorable Reward/Risk Ratio: The 2:1 reward to risk ratio is highly profitable if the win rate is high enough to sustain the strategy.


Weaknesses


  • Unsustainable Win Rate: The win rate is 24%, significantly lower than the 33.4% required to break even with a 2:1 reward to risk ratio, resulting in a negative mathematical expectancy of -28 pips per trade.


  • Consistent Losses: The channel did not deliver a profitable month for the entire 12-month analysis, averaging a loss of 2,108 pips every month.


  • Severe Drawdown: The net loss for 800 signals was 22,164 pips, a significant drawdown for any trader or investor.


  • Volatility Risks: The channel experienced high volatility risks, with the XAU/USD, or the Gold pair, often resulting in an average loss that was significantly higher than 28 pips, reaching as high as 190 pips, or close to 2 times the reward.


  • Degradation: The months with the highest number of signals also experienced a lower win rate, indicating that the quality of the signals was significantly affected.



Our Rating: Bad



Verdict: Lingrid Forex Signals is a channel that is not recommended for traders or potential traders, as the strategy is flawed and results in significant losses for its subscribers. The reward to risk ratio is 2:1, and though this is a highly profitable strategy, the low win rate ensures that the strategy is mathematically unprofitable. The fact that there are no profitable months for the entire 12-month analysis and a net loss of 22,000 pips is a clear indication that the strategy results in steady account depletion for its subscribers.


bottom of page