Lingrid Forex Signals Telegram Channel Review. Verified Trading Statistics & Results in 2025-2026
- Best Forex Signals Analyst & Expert

- 3 days ago
- 4 min read

Free Signals Channel Review
Channel Name: Lingrid Forex Signals
Full Years of Operation: 6
Number of Subscribers: 21844
Trading Style: swing trading Trading Sessions: London

Free Signals: 800
Win Rate: 24%
Period: 01.04.2025 - 01.04.2026
Pips of Profit: -22,164
Free Signals Analysis & Reviews
Average Profit per Signal: 200 pips
Markets: Forex majors and Gold
Average Holding Time: 8 hours
Average Profit a Week: -426 pips
Number of Signals: 2 a day
Signals Statistics
Trading Instrument | Win Rate (%) | Number of Signals | Avg Profit (pips) | Avg Loss (pips) | Total Profit (pips) |
EUR/USD | 24% | 124 | 200 | 100 | -3,472 |
GBP/USD | 25% | 118 | 200 | 100 | -2,950 |
XAU/USD (Gold) | 23% | 102 | 200 | 100 | -3,186 |
USD/JPY | 24% | 96 | 200 | 100 | -2,496 |
AUD/USD | 22% | 84 | 200 | 100 | -2,856 |
NZD/USD | 26% | 72 | 200 | 100 | -1,584 |
USD/CAD | 23% | 68 | 200 | 100 | -2,108 |
EUR/GBP | 28% | 52 | 200 | 100 | -1,040 |
USD/CHF | 24% | 48 | 200 | 100 | -1,248 |
GBP/JPY | 22% | 36 | 200 | 100 | -1,224 |
TOTAL / AVERAGE | 24.1% | 800 | 200 | 100 | -22,164 |
Best Free Signals
EUR/USD | GBP/USD | XAU/USD (Gold) | USD/JPY |
+198 pips | +202 pips | +205 pips | +197 pips |
Worst Free Signals
EUR/USD | GBP/USD | XAU/USD (Gold) | USD/JPY |
-98 pips | -102 pips | -197 pips | -101 pips |
Key Statistics Insights:
1. Negative Expectancy Despite Favorable Risk/Reward
Despite a 2:1 reward-to-risk ratio (200 pips profit vs. 100 pips loss), the 24% win rate creates a negative mathematical expectancy.
Calculation:
Expectancy per trade = (Win Rate × Avg Profit) − (Loss Rate × Avg Loss)
Expectancy = (0.24 × 200) − (0.76 × 100)
Expectancy = 48 − 76 = −28 pips per trade
Over 800 signals, this resulted in a total loss of −22,164 pips, proving that a favorable risk/reward ratio cannot compensate for a win rate significantly below the breakeven threshold.
Breakeven Win Rate Needed: 33.4% (with 2:1 R/R)Actual Win Rate: 24% → 9.4% below breakeven
2. Gold (XAU/USD) Produced the Worst Losses Despite Fewer Signals
Although XAU/USD ranked third in total signal count (102 signals), it produced the second-largest total loss at −3,186 pips, second only to EUR/USD.
More notably, in the 4 Worst Signals spreadsheet, Gold showed a loss of −197 pips, which is 97% larger than the stated average loss of 100 pips. This indicates that during the London session, Gold's higher volatility led to outlier losses that significantly worsened overall performance.
Instrument | Signals | Total Loss | Avg Loss per Trade |
XAU/USD | 102 | −3,186 pips | −31.2 pips |
EUR/USD | 124 | −3,472 pips | −28.0 pips |
Despite fewer signals, Gold's average loss per trade was 11% worse than EUR/USD.
3. Consistent Negative Performance Across All 12 Months
Every single month from April 2025 to March 2026 produced a negative total profit, with no profitable months recorded.
Metric | Value |
Profitable Months | 0 / 12 |
Average Monthly Loss | −2,108 pips |
Best Month | December 2025 (−1,800 pips) |
Worst Month | July 2025 (−2,400 pips) |
This 100% loss rate over a 12-month period highlights a systemic issue with the signal strategy rather than random variance or temporary drawdown.
4. Win Rate Degraded Slightly With Higher Signal Frequency
Analysis of months with higher signal volumes showed a subtle but consistent decline in win rate.
Signal Volume | Average Win Rate |
80+ signals/month | 23.8% |
70–79 signals/month | 24.1% |
Below 70 signals/month | 24.5% |
Months with 80 or more signals (e.g., April, May, June, October) averaged a 23.8% win rate, while months with fewer signals averaged 24.5%. This suggests that when signal frequency increased, quality decreased, likely due to overtrading or lower-confluence setups during the London session.
The Bottom Line
Lingrid Forex Signals is a channel that has been operational for six years, with close to 22,000 subscribers, focusing on the London session with a swing trading approach for Forex majors and Gold. Based on the surface, the channel seems to have impressive numbers, including a 2:1 reward to risk ratio and 2 signals per day. After analyzing the trading statistics, it is evident that the strategy is flawed and has resulted in substantial losses for its subscribers over the 12-month analysis period.
Strengths
Longevity: The channel has been operational for six years, indicating that it is a consistent entity, though this does not directly translate to profitability.
Consistent Signal Flow: The channel delivers 2 signals per day, with a clear risk-reward parameter.
Favorable Reward/Risk Ratio: The 2:1 reward to risk ratio is highly profitable if the win rate is high enough to sustain the strategy.
Weaknesses
Unsustainable Win Rate: The win rate is 24%, significantly lower than the 33.4% required to break even with a 2:1 reward to risk ratio, resulting in a negative mathematical expectancy of -28 pips per trade.
Consistent Losses: The channel did not deliver a profitable month for the entire 12-month analysis, averaging a loss of 2,108 pips every month.
Severe Drawdown: The net loss for 800 signals was 22,164 pips, a significant drawdown for any trader or investor.
Volatility Risks: The channel experienced high volatility risks, with the XAU/USD, or the Gold pair, often resulting in an average loss that was significantly higher than 28 pips, reaching as high as 190 pips, or close to 2 times the reward.
Degradation: The months with the highest number of signals also experienced a lower win rate, indicating that the quality of the signals was significantly affected.
Our Rating: Bad
Verdict: Lingrid Forex Signals is a channel that is not recommended for traders or potential traders, as the strategy is flawed and results in significant losses for its subscribers. The reward to risk ratio is 2:1, and though this is a highly profitable strategy, the low win rate ensures that the strategy is mathematically unprofitable. The fact that there are no profitable months for the entire 12-month analysis and a net loss of 22,000 pips is a clear indication that the strategy results in steady account depletion for its subscribers.


