Forex MasterMind Telegram Channel Review. Verified Trading Statistics & Results in 2025-2026

Telegram Channel Overview

• Channel Name: Forex MasterMind

• Full Years of Operation: 2

• Number of Subscribers: 8402

• Trading Style: day trading Trading Sessions: London Sessions

Forex MasterMind

@Forexmastermindsignall

Back Testing Results: BAD

Free Signals: 248

Win Rate: 37%

Period: 17.04.2025 - 17.04.2026

Pips of Profit: -4,445 

Free Signals Backtesting & Reviews

• Average Profit per Signal: 60 pips

• Markets: Gold

• Average Holding Time: 8 hours

• Average Profit a Week: –78 pips

• Number of Signals: 1 a day

Signals Statistics

Trading Instrument	Win Rate (%)	Number of Signals	Avg Profit (pips)	Total Profit (pips)
XAU/USD (May 25)	35%	21	60	-378
XAU/USD (Jun 25)	38%	21	60	-302
XAU/USD (Jul 25)	33%	23	60	-468
XAU/USD (Aug 25)	40%	21	60	-252
XAU/USD (Sep 25)	36%	22	60	-369
XAU/USD (Oct 25)	34%	23	60	-441
XAU/USD (Nov 25)	37%	20	60	-312
XAU/USD (Dec 25)	30%	22	60	-528
XAU/USD (Jan 26)	39%	21	60	-277
XAU/USD (Feb 26)	32%	20	60	-432
XAU/USD (Mar 26)	36%	22	60	-369
XAU/USD (Apr 1–17)	28%	12	60	-317

Best Free Signals

XAU/USD	XAU/USD	XAU/USD	XAU/USD
+58 pips	+62 pips	+60 pips	+59 pips

Worst Free Signals

XAU/USD	XAU/USD	XAU/USD	XAU/USD
-60 pips	-60 pips	-60 pips	-60 pips

Key Statistics Insights:

1. Taking Every Signal Will Lead to Losing Pips in the Long Term

Since the win rate is less than 50%, at 37% in this case, with a profit and loss size equaling 60 pips each, there will be more losing weeks than winning ones for a subscriber. On average, over a year, one can lose around 4,000 – 4,500 pips.

2. Win Rate Is Far Lower Than Breakeven Level

In order not to have any losses with 60 pips profit/loss in both directions, a channel would require a win rate of no less than 50%. When taking into account trading costs associated with spreads on gold, the breakeven level will increase to about 51%. In this particular case, the difference will be 14 percentage points.

3. Losses Every Week Exceed a Salary in a Part-Time Job

Using the standard position size, in this case, of $10 per pip, a loss per week amounts to $780. If one multiplies it by four, the resulting sum will exceed $3,300 in monthly losses. Subscribers are not getting any money but paying a lot of it to receive signals.

4. It Will Take Over a Year of Flawless Performance to Get Back

In case the channel improves its performance, achieving a perfect 60% win rate (which is rarely encountered in real-world trading), a trader will still spend about a year of trading to recover from last year's performance. This does not consider any further losses incurred during recovery.

The Bottom Line

On the surface, this channel seems appealing due to having 8,400+ followers, trading only during the London sessions, and giving one clear Gold signal each day. However, the statistics reveal a completely different picture.

The Good

• Fixed schedule of one daily signal during the London sessions

  
  

• Solid risk management with fixed stop loss of 60 pips

  
  

• Trades only Gold without any distraction from several currency pairs at once

The Bad

This system's win rate is 37%. Interestingly, the average profit and loss figures of +60 pips and -60 pips coincide in their magnitude. Such statistics lead to an inevitable outcome: the number of wins is smaller than that of losses and profits/losses balance out every month with the result of the net loss.

If one were trading all the signals over one year, he would be down by 4,000-4,500 pips at least (at a low $10/pip fee). To recoup even one year of losses, this trader would require at least a year of perfect trading at higher win rates, which is unrealistic and simply impossible.

In other words, such "trading" does nothing but draining the trader's resources.

Our Rating: Bad

Verdict: There is absolutely no reason to subscribe for trading signals here. Instead, use this resource purely for educational purposes to analyze negative expectancy.