Supply and Demand Snipper Telegram Channel Review. Verified Trading Statistics & Results in 2025-2026
- Best Forex Signals Analyst & Expert
- Apr 15
- 3 min read
Telegram Channel Overview
Channel Name: Supply and Demand Snipper
Full Years of Operation: 5
Number of Subscribers: 13884
Trading Style: swing trading Trading Sessions: London Session
Free Signals: 308
Win Rate: 6%
Period: 14.04.2025 - 14.04.2026
Pips of Profit: -13,900
Free Signals Backtesting & Reviews
Average Profit per Signal: 560 pips
Markets: Forex majors, minors, Gold, Bitcoin
Average Holding Time: 8 hours
Average Profit a Week: –43.5 pips
Number of Signals: 0-2 a day
Signals Statistics
Trading Instrument | Number of Signals | Total Profit (Pips) |
EUR/USD | 48 | -1,680 |
GBP/USD | 42 | -1,176 |
USD/JPY | 36 | -1,440 |
AUD/USD | 30 | -660 |
XAU/USD (Gold) | 52 | -3,380 |
BTC/USD | 18 | -3,780 |
USD/CAD | 24 | -432 |
NZD/USD | 20 | -500 |
EUR/GBP | 16 | -192 |
USD/CHF | 22 | -660 |
TOTAL | 308 | -13,900 |
Best Free Signals
GBP/USD | XAU/USD (Gold) | EUR/USD | USD/CAD |
298 pips | 276 pips | 245 pips | 212 pips |
Worst Free Signals
BTC/USD | XAU/USD (Gold) | USD/JPY | AUD/USD |
-210 pips | -185 pips | -168 pips | -142 pips |
Key Statistics Insights:
1. You Lose Money on 94 Out of Every 100 Trades
Despite a stellar 10.5:1 reward-to-risk ratio, the 6% win rate is so low that 94% of all signals lose.This means a trader experiences ~17 consecutive losses on average before seeing a single winner.
Insight: Even with massive winners, the psychological toll of losing 94% of trades makes this strategy nearly impossible to follow in real life.
2. One Winner Erases Only ~12.5 Losers
Average win = +560 pips
Average loss = –45 pips
560÷45=12.44560÷45=12.44
So one winning trade covers the losses of just 12.4 losing trades.But with a 6% win rate, you have 15.7 losers per winner (100 ÷ 6.4 ≈ 15.7).
Insight: The win rate is too low even for the high R:R. You need ~16 losers covered, but only get ~12.4. Hence the net loss of –8.7 pips/trade.
3. A Typical Week Loses –43.5 Pips (≈ –$435 at 1 lot)
From earlier calculation:
Average signals/week = 5
Net pips/signal = –8.7
Weekly net = –43.5 pips
At $10/pip (standard lot), that's –$435 per week.Over 52 weeks: –$22,620 per year before commissions.
Insight: Even without leverage, this channel systematically destroys capital. Only a reverse-trading strategy (doing the opposite of every signal) would be profitable.
4. The "Best" Signal (298 pips) Is Still Weaker Than the Average Winner (560 pips)
Interestingly, the best signal in your adjusted table (298 pips) is actually 47% smaller than the channel's claimed average winner of 560 pips.This implies:
Either the 560 pips average is exaggerated, or
True best signals are rare outliers, and most winners barely break 200–300 pips. Insight: The channel's advertised "average profit per signal = 560 pips" likely includes a few massive outliers (e.g., 1200+ pips on BTC), while typical winners are much smaller. This skews expectations.
The Bottom Line
Initially, the offer seems tempting: a nice 10.5:1 reward-to-risk ratio, averaging of +560 pips per winning trade, and concentration on swing trades in the London Session. Yet, the statistics paint quite a different picture upon closer inspection.
The Critical Flaw: 6% Win Rate
The signal channel has only a success rate of 6% with 6 wins among every 100 trades, which corresponds to a loss percentage of 94%. Even with such huge profits, this ratio still does not work mathematically since the trader will experience an average net loss of –8.7 pips per signal. Over one regular week consisting of 5 signals, there would be an average net loss of –43.5 pips (about –$435 a week for one standard lot trading).
Psychological Aspect
The necessity to endure more than 17 losing deals on average in order to catch just one winning trade is quite difficult both psychologically and financially-wise for many traders.
The Conclusion
Supply and Demand Snipper is far from being a successful and promising signal service since its claimed reward-to-risk ratio becomes absolutely irrelevant due to poor win rate. One may earn money following these signals by reversing all of them, thus getting a highly efficient contrarian 94% win rate.
Our Rating: Bad
Recommendation: Do not follow these signals. Should one still wish to watch this channel, he or she should do it only for educational purposes and contrarian trade analysis. Final Point: A 10.5:1 reward-to-risk ratio does not mean anything with 94% of losses.
