Technical Pips Telegram Channel Review. Verified Trading Statistics & Results in 2025-2026
- Best Forex Signals Analyst & Expert
- 2 days ago
- 3 min read
Telegram Channel Overview
Channel Name: Technical Pips
Full Years of Operation: 1
Number of Subscribers: 46183
Trading Style: scalping, day trading Trading Sessions: London Sessions
Free Signals: 1,433
Win Rate: 27%
Period: 23.04.2025 - 23.04.2026
Pips of Profit: −101,671
Free Signals Backtesting & Reviews
Average Profit per Signal: 60 pips
Markets: Gold
Average Holding Time: 8 hours
Average Profit a Week: −1,955 pips
Number of Signals: 3-6 a day
Signals Statistics
Month | Signals | Total Pips |
May 2025 | 118 | −8,425 |
Jun 2025 | 124 | −8,506 |
Jul 2025 | 115 | −8,832 |
Aug 2025 | 130 | −8,112 |
Sep 2025 | 108 | −8,683 |
Oct 2025 | 122 | −8,710 |
Nov 2025 | 116 | −8,700 |
Dec 2025 | 128 | −8,294 |
Jan 2026 | 112 | −8,803 |
Feb 2026 | 120 | −8,352 |
Mar 2026 | 119 | −8,615 |
Apr 2026 (up to 23rd) | 121 | −8,639 |
TOTAL | 1,433 | −101,671 |
Best Free Signals
Gold | Gold | Gold | Gold |
+60 pips | +58 pips | +60 pips | +59 pips |
Worst Free Signals
Gold | Gold | Gold | Gold |
-120 pips | -120 pips | -119 pips | -121 pips |
Key Statistics Insights:
You Would Need a 67% Win Rate Just to Break Even
With a Reward/Risk ratio of 0.5 (win 60 pips / lose 120 pips), the breakeven win rate is calculated as:
Breakeven Win Rate = 1 / (1 + R:R) = 1 / (1 + 0.5) = 66.7%
The channel's actual win rate is 27% — meaning they would need to more than double their win rate just to stop losing money. At 27%, you lose money on every single trade on average.
2. Following Every Signal for One Year Is Mathematically Guaranteed to Lose
Expected value per trade = −71.4 pips.After 1,433 trades:
−71.4 × 1,433 = −102,316 pips (the simulation gave −101,671 pips — nearly identical)
This is not bad luck. It is mathematical certainty given their R:R and win rate.
3. One Losing Trade Wipes Out Two Winning Trades
1 win = +60 pips
1 loss = −120 pips
One loss = two wins completely erased + 0 pips leftover
Since their win rate is only 27%, for every 100 trades:
27 wins = +1,620 pips
73 losses = −8,760 pips
Net = −7,140 pips
You would need 73 wins just to cancel out 73 losses — but they only get 27 wins.
4. Weekly Loss Is Equivalent to a Full-Time Salary in Reverse
Average weekly loss = −1,955 pips
In dollar terms (1 standard lot Gold = $10 per pip): −$19,550 per week
Even at 0.01 lot (micro account), that is −$195.50 per week or −$10,166 per year.
You would effectively be paying $10,000+ annually for the privilege of receiving "free" signals.
The Bottom Line
On the surface, Technical Pips seems like a legitimate signal provider with 46,183 subscribers and one year of existence. A closer look at the stats tells a very different story – one of systematic losses.
The Cold Hard Facts
Win rate: 27% (awful)
Reward/Risk ratio: 0.5 (lossing trade is worth double winning trade)
Average Loss: −120 pips
Average Win: +60 pips
End result over 1 year (1,433 signals): −101,671 pips
Why this channel cannot work
Math does not lie – with an R:R ratio of 0.5, you need 66.7% win rate to break even. Technical Pips gives only 27% of that which is far less than required.
Each trade has an expected value of −71.4 pips. Trading all signals for a whole year would guarantee losses no matter what happens to the markets and regardless of account balance.
Reality for a Subscriber
Loss per week: −1,955 pips
Single loss will cover two wins with nothing left over
Maximum profit on one trade: +60 pips (maximum allowed)
Maximum loss on one trade: −120 pips (regular)
Even trading 0.01 lots (micro account) would still cost a subscriber about $10,000 yearly losses.
Technical Pips does not provide any trading signals. It acts as a money sink from users to markets (and maybe back to the channel itself via rebates or opposite trades). These 46,183 users might think they get "free" signals, but in reality, they pay dearly for their losses.
Our Rating: Bad
Verdict: Quit this channel right away! Randomly tossing a coin (50% win rate) would work way better than this. Even worse is trading losing strategies.
