TradewithQasem Telegram Channel Review. Verified Trading Statistics & Results in 2024-2025
- Best Forex Signals Analyst & Expert
- Jan 10
- 3 min read
Free Signals Channel Review
Channel Name: TradewithQasem
Full Years of Operation: 2
Number of Subscribers: 22444
Trading Style: day trading Trading Sessions: London
Free Signals: 509
Win Rate: 32%
Period: 10.01.2024 - 10.01.2026
Pips of Profit: -10,436
Free Signals Analysis & Reviews
Average Profit per Signal: 44 pips
Markets: Gold
Average Holding Time: 8 hours
Average Profit a Week: -195 pips
Number of Signals a Day: 1-2
Signals Statistics
Month (Year-Month) | Instrument | Win Rate (%) | # of Signals | Avg Profit (Pips) | Total Profit (Pips) |
2025-01 | XAU/USD | 35% | 42 | 43 | -630 |
2025-02 | XAU/USD | 30% | 38 | 45 | -870 |
2025-03 | XAU/USD | 33% | 44 | 44 | -792 |
2025-04 | XAU/USD | 28% | 40 | 46 | -1,088 |
2025-05 | XAU/USD | 32% | 43 | 42 | -756 |
2025-06 | XAU/USD | 31% | 39 | 45 | -945 |
2025-07 | XAU/USD | 35% | 41 | 43 | -615 |
2025-08 | XAU/USD | 29% | 45 | 44 | -1,188 |
2025-09 | XAU/USD | 34% | 38 | 42 | -516 |
2025-10 | XAU/USD | 30% | 44 | 46 | -1,056 |
2025-11 | XAU/USD | 33% | 42 | 43 | -693 |
2025-12 | XAU/USD | 31% | 39 | 45 | -975 |
2026-01* | XAU/USD | 33% | 14 | 44 | -252 |
Best Free Signals
XAU/USD | XAU/USD | XAU/USD | XAU/USD |
+158 pips | +132 pips | +121 pips | +109 pips |
Worst Free Signals
XAU/USD | XAU/USD | XAU/USD | XAU/USD |
-95 pips | -88 pips | -84 pips | -80 pips |
Key Statistics Insights:
Catastrophic Performance Profile
A strategy combining a low probability of winning (32%) and a poor value of RRR (0.7) leads to a mathematically flawed system. The expected value of each trade is veryNegative: (0.32 44) + (0.68 -60) = -24.32 pips. Overall, it indicates a loss of more than 24 pips per trade signaled; this leads to massive annual losses of -10,436 pips.
“The Outlier Trap” for Followers
Although the four strongest signals made impressive gains of +109 to +158 pips, they are merely statistical anomalies in a sea of deficits. The average follower would have to experience about 18 consecutive losing transactions before experiencing one of the big gains. This sort of trend almost always results in an account blowout either through margin calls or frustration quits well before the big win.
Inefficiency of Time vs. Profit
Since the average time spent per trade was 8 hours, the total number of hours spent by the subscribers on these trades is approximately 4,072 hours (509 trades x 8 hours per trade). Consequently, a net loss of -10,436 pips was registered, which is equivalent to a loss of -2.56 pips per hour.
Consistency of Underperformance
This data also confirms the consistent nature of the losses regardless of the prevailing market type, as there has not been a single profitable month in the last 13 months. The proximity of the losses (-516 to -1,188 pips) also illustrates the fact that the problem with the strategy is not market-dependent. This is indicative of the strategy being methodologically flawed in both trending and ranging markets.
The Bottom Line
However, the problem with the signals provided by the "Trade with Qasem" system is this—it’s a substandard signals provision system, but it’s much worse than that. It’s a system whose trading logic has mathematically been proven to result in a loss. This system, running for a period of two years, has effectively reduced capital, with our simulation of one-year tracking resulting in a staggering figure of –10,436 pips.
Key Flaws:
Doomed Risk/Reward Profile: Win rate of 32% with a risk/reward ratio of 0.7. Its strategy’s expected value is very negative. Each signal tracked will likely result in a net loss of money.
Emotional and Financial Trap: Sometimes the trader has large winning trades (+100 to +150 pips), which give an appearance of potential, but small losses occur regularly, liquidating the account. The follower is headed for disaster.
Inefficient Utilization of Capital and Time: The 8-hour average trade locks away the capital for an extended period of time with the average loss of 195 pips per week in the account. All the time used in handling the losing trade is simply wasted.
Our Rating: Bad
Bottom Line: It is a prime example of the problem that plagues the world of trading signals: emphasis on activity and "trading setups" far more than profitable outcomes. Steer clear from it. Putting money into acting on these signals would be best spent in a saving account—and literally anywhere else. There is no need to interpret the information; it is money wasted to subscribe.
