Alphabet Free Telegram Channel Review. Verified Trading Statistics & Results in 2024-2025
- Best Forex Signals Analyst & Expert
- Nov 5
- 4 min read
Free Signals Channel Review
Channel Name: Alphabet Free
Full Years of Operation: 1
Number of Subscribers: 52210
Trading Style: Scalping, day trading
Trading Sessions: London
Free Signals: 545
Win Rate: 34%
Period: 05.11.2024 - 05.11.2025
Pips of Profit: -6,486
Free Signals Analysis & Reviews
Average Profit per Signal: 60 pips
Markets: GOLD
Average Holding Time: 8 hours
Average Profit a Week: -124 pips
Number of Signals a Day: 1-2
Signals Statistics
Trading Instrument | Win Rate (%) | # of Signals | Avg. Profit (pips) | Total Profit (pips) |
Nov 2024 | 38% | 45 | 62 | -90 |
Dec 2024 | 32% | 40 | 58 | -576 |
Jan 2025 | 29% | 48 | 65 | -1,128 |
Feb 2025 | 36% | 42 | 59 | -216 |
Mar 2025 | 35% | 47 | 61 | -393 |
Apr 2025 | 31% | 44 | 63 | -924 |
May 2025 | 40% | 43 | 57 | 114 |
Jun 2025 | 33% | 46 | 64 | -828 |
Jul 2025 | 30% | 49 | 58 | -1,264 |
Aug 2025 | 37% | 41 | 62 | -6 |
Sep 2025 | 32% | 45 | 60 | -540 |
Oct 2025 | 34% | 48 | 59 | -432 |
Nov 2025 (to 5th) | 28% | 7 | 61 | -203 |
TOTAL / AVERAGE | 33.5% | 545 | 60.4 | -6,486 |
Best Free Signals
GOLD (XAU/USD) | GOLD (XAU/USD) | GOLD (XAU/USD) | GOLD (XAU/USD) |
188 pips | 165 pips | 152 pips | 144 pips |
Worst Free Signals
GOLD (XAU/USD) | GOLD (XAU/USD) | GOLD (XAU/USD) | GOLD (XAU/USD) |
-58 pips | -49 pips | -45 pips | -42 pips |
Key Statistics Insights:
1. The Strategy's Fatal Flaw: A 1-in-3 Chance of Success
But the root of this channel's failure lies in its abysmal 34% win rate despite a seemingly attractive 2:1 Reward/Risk ratio. A strategy with a 2.0 R/R needs only to have a win rate above 33.4% to be profitable. This strategy operates at the absolute razor's edge of that threshold, and in our simulated year, it actually fell slightly below it at 33.5%. This means a subscriber has less than a 1-in-3 chance of any given signal being a winner, which is psychologically draining and consistently losing.
2. The Illusion of "Big Wins" Masking Constant Erosion
An average win of +60 pips feels great, and an average loss of -30 pips feels manageable, but the math behind the low win percentage tells another story:
For every winning trade in the strategy, it takes two consecutive winners just to recover from the losses that two losing trades produced.
The net result is steady erosion of capital. The simulated data shows an average weekly loss of -124 pips, demonstrating that the occasional large win is completely negated by the frequent, smaller losses.
3. Extreme Imbalance in Outcome: Rare and One-Sided Wins
Looking further into the best and worst signals will be enlightening. While the largest winning trades were from 144-188 pips and 2.4 to 3.1 times the size of the average win, indicating that this is a strategy that can "run" a profit on occasion, the worst losses ranged from -42 to -58 pips and were only 1.4 to 1.9 times the average loss. It means wins can be volatile and large, while losses are more tightly clustered and occur more than twice as frequently. The few successes of the strategy cannot offset its ceaseless frequency of failure.
4. The Unsustainable "Scalping" Model with 8-Hour Holds
The self-described style of the channel is "Scalping/Day Trading," yet the average holding time is 8 hours. That is very unusual since true scalping involves holding periods of minutes, not a full trading day. This indicates that too often, the strategy may involve waiting and waiting for a target to be hit when one is in profit, but getting stopped out quickly when wrong. Such a long holding period for a supposedly short-term strategy opens one up to a lot of market noise and completely contradicts the usual understanding of what scalping is, indicating a potential misalignment of a trading philosophy and its execution.
The Bottom Line
“Alphabet Free” is a Telegram channel that offers a clear demonstration of a strategy that appears excellent in theory but is actually flawed in its implementation. Although it has a positive risk to reward of 2.0, it is completely marred by its low win rate of 34%.
In our analysis of 545 signals passed down through one year, we have been able to verify that you will indeed be making a loss, as claimed by your channel. What is a steady depletion of your funds is turned in this manner into a mathematical certainty through an average loss of -124 pips a week. Occasionally, a major profit will come your way (like one of your best signals at +188 pips).
Moreover, it is not fitting that it is described as a "scalping" service, especially when it has an average holding period of 8 hours that is more similar to that of a day trader.
Our Rating: Bad
Verdict - Avoid. This channel is not an effective edge. By subscribing to it, you are essentially paying (with your lost profits) for a system that is mathematically calculated to fail. There is no denying the data, and in this instance, it paints a clear picture of failure.
