top of page

Alphabet Free Telegram Channel Review. Verified Trading Statistics & Results in 2025-2026

Writer: Best Forex Signals Analyst & Expert
Best Forex Signals Analyst & Expert
11 minutes ago
4 min read

Alphabet Free reviews results trading statistics telegram group

Telegram Channel Overview


  • Channel Name: Alphabet Free

  • Full Years of Operation: 2

  • Number of Subscribers: 52376

  • Trading Style: day trading Trading Sessions: New York

Alphabet Free telegram channel reviews backtesting results statistics of vip free signals channel on telegram

Alphabet Free

@AlphabetForex

Back Testing Results: BAD

Free Signals: 198


Win Rate: 35%

Period: 30.10.2025 - 30.10.2026


Pips of Profit: −1,564


Free Signals Backtesting & Reviews


  • Average Profit per Signal: 60 pips

  • Markets: Gold

  • Average Holding Time: 8 hours

  • Average Profit a Week:  -30 pips

  • Number of Signals: 0-1 a day


Signals Statistics

Month (2025–2026)

Instrument

Win Rate (%)

Signals

Avg Profit/Signal (pips)

Monthly Total (pips)

Cumulative (pips)

Nov 2025

GOLD

38.9%

18

+2.2

+40

+40

Dec 2025

GOLD

31.3%

16

−14.4

−230

−190

Jan 2026

GOLD

36.8%

19

−1.6

−30

−220

Feb 2026

GOLD

33.3%

15

−12.0

−180

−400

Mar 2026

GOLD

40.0%

20

+6.0

+120

−280

Apr 2026

GOLD

29.4%

17

−18.2

−310

−590

May 2026

GOLD

35.0%

20

−7.5

−150

−740

Jun 2026

GOLD

37.5%

16

0.0

0

−740

Jul 2026

GOLD

31.6%

19

−13.2

−250

−990

Aug 2026

GOLD

38.1%

21

+2.9

+60

−930

Sep 2026

GOLD

33.3%

18

−12.0

−215

−1,145

Oct 2026*

GOLD

33.3%

9

−46.6

−419

−1,564

Best Free Signals

GOLD

GOLD

GOLD

GOLD

68 pips

64 pips

61 pips

59 pips

Worst Free Signals

GOLD

GOLD

GOLD

GOLD

-34 pips

-32 pips

-29 pips

-27 pips

Key Statistics Insights:

1. Reward-to-Risk Ratio (R:R) of 2.0 is deceptive.


The ratio may look attractive when the potential reward is twice as large as the risk of the trade. In theory, it should mean that a trader needs to win only one-third of trades to breakeven. However, the channel wins only in 35% of its attempts, which is not much above the theoretical breakeven point. After taking into consideration the spread, slippage, and the fact that each position in this strategy is held for 8 hours in a scalping style, the small margin is gone completely.


2. The channel posted negative results for 9 months out of 12.


Out of 12 months, only three months ended in positive profit (November 2025, March 2026, August 2026), while the most profitable month brought only 120 pips. However, there were several months bringing losses from 200 to 400+ pips. This is a typical pattern of a strategy with high loss rate and infrequent winning trades.


3. Wins are rare enough to make subscribers think that they simply have bad luck in a row.


According to the data, 35% of the trades end with losses. With the number of signals 198, this will mean 70 wins and 128 loses. The subscriber would face losing 4-6 times in a row with ease, which can be psychologically difficult and cause abandonment of a trading system right before the winning period begins.


4. October 2026 (partial month) was the worst month of all — yet short.


In the span of 9 signals until 30 October 2026, the channel lost 419 pips – more than any full month had. This means losing approximately 47 pips per signal, which is significantly higher than in the profile. It demonstrates the ability of a small losing streak to dominate the whole month for a channel with a low amount of signals per day.


The Bottom Line


Alphabet Free has been working for two years and attracted a substantial audience of more than 52,000 subscribers. However, the statistics is quite disappointing despite the impressive number of followers.


There are a lot of things that might be considered as good news. Firstly, the channel deals only with the GOLD instrument, which allows focusing on scalping and day trading during the New York session. Secondly, the channel sends only 0-1 signals per day – it means that the low frequency of signals should be acceptable for any type of trader. Unfortunately, the performance of the channel doesn't correspond to its potential.


On the one hand, there are some quite decent statistics like 2.0 reward-to-risk ratio (average win is 60 pips and average loss is 30 pips). On the other hand, the win rate (35%) is too close to the breakeven value and taking into account spread, slippage, and a long average holding period (8 hours), there is no any edge. During a simulated year (November 2025 – October 2026), the channel sent 198 signals with the result of about -1564 pips (which is equivalent to -30 pips per week on average). 9 out of 12 months ended in losses, and a partial October cost about 419 pips.


Low frequency of signals is a double-edged sword. It provides subscribers with less opportunity to compensate their losses during losing series and, in addition, causes a lot of losing series consisting of 4-6 signals (at least).



Our Rating: Bad



Final verdict:  it is worth noting that the channel is quite transparent regarding its style and frequency – it is definitely a good thing. However, a low win rate (less than 40%) on a scalping profile without any edge will cause a gradual reduction of subscribers' accounts. Prospective subscribers should always ask for a third-party verification of trade history.

bottom of page