top of page

Technical Pips Telegram Channel Review. Verified Trading Statistics & Results in 2025-2026

Writer: Best Forex Signals Analyst & Expert
Best Forex Signals Analyst & Expert
11 minutes ago
3 min read

Technical Pips reviews results trading statistics telegram group

Telegram Channel Overview


  • Channel Name: Technical Pips 

  • Full Years of Operation: 1

  • Number of Subscribers: 58284

  • Trading Style: scalping, day trading Trading Sessions: Asia and New York

Technical Pips telegram channel reviews backtesting results statistics of vip free signals channel on telegram

Technical Pips 

@TechnicalPips6273

Back Testing Results: BAD

Free Signals: 512


Win Rate: 41%

Period: 28.10.2025 - 28.10.2026


Pips of Profit: −10,496


Free Signals Backtesting & Reviews


  • Average Profit per Signal: 55 pips

  • Markets: Gold

  • Average Holding Time: 8 hours

  • Average Profit a Week:  -202 pips

  • Number of Signals:1-2 a day


Signals Statistics

Month

Signals

Wins

Losses

Win Rate (%)

Avg Profit (pips)

Total Profit (pips)

Nov 2025

44

18

26

40.9

−22.0

−968

Dec 2025

38

16

22

42.1

−14.5

−551

Jan 2026

47

19

28

40.4

−26.0

−1,222

Feb 2026

42

17

25

40.5

−23.5

−987

Mar 2026

49

20

29

40.8

−21.0

−1,029

Apr 2026

40

17

23

42.5

−12.0

−480

May 2026

45

18

27

40.0

−28.5

−1,283

Jun 2026

39

16

23

41.0

−19.0

−741

Jul 2026

46

19

27

41.3

−22.5

−1,035

Aug 2026

41

17

24

41.5

−18.0

−738

Sep 2026

43

18

25

41.9

−15.5

−667

Oct 2026*

38

15

23

39.5

−24.5

−795

Total

512

210

302

41.0

−20.5

−10,496

Best Free Signals

GOLD (XAU/USD)

GOLD (XAU/USD)

GOLD (XAU/USD)

GOLD (XAU/USD)

+72 pips

+66 pips

+61 pips

+55 pips

Worst Free Signals

GOLD (XAU/USD)

GOLD (XAU/USD)

GOLD (XAU/USD)

GOLD (XAU/USD)

−152 pips

−145 pips

−138 pips

−130 pips

Key Statistics Insights:

1. The channel wins less often than it loses, and the winnings are lesser than the losses.


In addition, a 41% win rate suggests that the channel is correct four out of ten times, which implies that six out of ten signals go wrong. Moreover, each loss is over double in size compared to the winnings: −130 pips versus +55 pips.


2. On average, every week brings about 200 pips losses.


On average, every week the channel brings about −202 pips. In the whole year, there were no profitable months; on the contrary, the monthly performance in every of the twelve months is negative, and May 2026 was the worst with −1,283 pips while April 2026 was the "best" with −480 pips.


3. The signals occur very often but take much time.


Since there are 1–2 signals daily and their average holding time is eight hours, then the channel keeps its subscribers constantly in the market. However, despite the high activity level, the overall performance was about −10,500 pips within 512 signals.


4. The worst losses exceed the best winnings.


The worst single trades are almost three times bigger than the best winnings in size: −152 pips and +72 pips


The Bottom Line


Technical Pips has been running for a single year with 58,284 subscribers who are trading only GOLD with scalping/day-trading method during Asia and New York sessions. It may look active and focused on trading, with 1–2 signals a day, holding for about 8 hours, and plenty of trading advice.


However, according to the statistics, the channel is losing money. 41% winning rate with an average winning of 55 pips and an average loss of 130 pips means the channel wins less and less often and with lower numbers than it loses. The ratio of 0.42 between the average winning and average loss is significantly low for the channel to be profitable with such win rate. Thus, all signals from the channel have negative expectancy. During a year and 512 signals, it resulted in −10,500 pips, all 12 months were losing, and there was about −200 pips lost on average each week.


High frequency of signals and 8-hour hold make subscribers continuously open deals and lose money with no edge at all; moreover, the high occasional losses (−152 pips) are much higher than the best winning (+72 pips). For a free channel, the losses will be shown in the form of drawdown of your account balance.



Our Rating: Bad



Final verdict: In conclusion, a large number of subscribers and active channel cannot hide the fact that the channel has a losing strategy. Unless the win rate or the ratio of winning and losses gets much better, the channel should be avoided.

bottom of page